Why I still shoot film...

Discussion in 'Ethics and Philosophy' started by tonyjuliano, Jan 18, 2011.

  1. tonyjuliano

    tonyjuliano Member

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Glenside, Pe
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Read all about it, here.
     
  2. cbretteville

    cbretteville Member

    Messages:
    23
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I do it because I like it, I want to and I can.
    C
     
  3. M.A.Longmore

    M.A.Longmore Member

    Messages:
    1,887
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Location:
    New York
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    .
    Thank You, Sir !
     
  4. Jeff Kubach

    Jeff Kubach Member

    Messages:
    6,930
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Location:
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I like film, that's it!

    Jeff
     
  5. Roger Thoms

    Roger Thoms Subscriber

    Messages:
    905
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Location:
    San Francisc
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    With most of my cameras I have no choice but to shoot film. Looks like you are in the same boat with all those nice rangefinders.

    Roger
     
  6. tonyjuliano

    tonyjuliano Member

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Glenside, Pe
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    I do have an affinity for rangefinders (but I have a Canon EOS3, and some good glass too).
     
  7. tonyjuliano

    tonyjuliano Member

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Glenside, Pe
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
  8. Red Robin

    Red Robin Member

    Messages:
    69
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Location:
    Wrinkle City
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Film? YES! (if you want to)

    It's tiring to have this "either-or " arguments on most sites. I have a modest little P&S /7mp pocket camera comes in handy. The rest are older SLR's w/A smattering of fixed lens RF's. Then there's what I use on a regular basis : My Canon P's and the Bessa R. Both are screw mount, the P's are old the R is getting older. My point is they ALL have a place. They ALL have a use. Large format is not what it use to be but should I want to try and learn it I could. It's possible to use most any of old historic cameras, some one somewhere sells the supplies, or will make them (for a price), it's not about either-or to me it's what do I want to learn next.:D
     
  9. benjiboy

    benjiboy Subscriber

    Messages:
    8,531
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Location:
    U.K.
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I would be more convinced if the O.P. only shot film, not "sometimes".
     
  10. 6x7

    6x7 Member

    Messages:
    10
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Location:
    United State
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Any reason is a good reason to shoot film :smile:
     
  11. shootsingh

    shootsingh Member

    Messages:
    23
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Location:
    LONDON
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Yes
    I prefer film where i want quality and perspective controll which is possible on large format. Similar is possible on digital too but for a very high price. Secondly i enjoy film along the digital as i always enjoyed painting along the film. Film will not die, canvas stands as an evidence
     
  12. WalterE54

    WalterE54 Member

    Messages:
    15
    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Shooter:
    8x10 Format
  13. shootsingh

    shootsingh Member

    Messages:
    23
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Location:
    LONDON
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  14. MSOKAL

    MSOKAL Member

    Messages:
    12
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
  15. zsas

    zsas Member

    Messages:
    1,961
    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Well said!
     
  16. zsas

    zsas Member

    Messages:
    1,961
    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter:
    35mm RF
    Love to dream up new ways to do it ( change developer, film brand, ISO, etc.) and just get my hands in the process. When I was digital I just looked, pressed a button, sorted through way too many photos for the perfect one, now I just compose for it while adjust the photographic triangle and wait till it comes to me, if not it wasn't meant to be.
     
  17. Newt_on_Swings

    Newt_on_Swings Member

    Messages:
    2,129
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Location:
    NYC
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I love the magic of it, the simplicity of it, the complexity of it, the surprises, the tones, the feel of the winder, seeing your work with a lightbox, printing the image, the list goes on...
     
  18. Bateleur

    Bateleur Member

    Messages:
    155
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Location:
    The Netherla
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Simply, the odour of the film as i pop open a fresh canister after opening the bright little box. The crisp affirmative feel of the film as it's threaded into the open teeth and the positive click as the first wind on takes the strain. The satisfying clump as the camera back closes (or the bottom plate clamps on). See the rewind knob merrily rotate as each new frame enthusiastically positions itself for the next picture, even as the last frame sings out its swansong and heads the train back to the canister. Waiting patiently for the song and dance of baths of chemicals and stand proud as little etchings of the marriage of mind and soul and light.........
     
  19. Paul Goutiere

    Paul Goutiere Subscriber

    Messages:
    625
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Location:
    Canmore Ab C
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    1) I can take my Nikon F2, that has been sitting on a shelf for a whole year or more, and take a picture with it immediately. I don't have to charge a battery or wait for the thing to figure out it is a camera.
    (I'd never leave my Nikon F2 on a shelf for a whole year, or more, but I could)

    2) For every picture I take with my Rolleiflex I realize that I only started with room for 12 shots. I can take my time considering composition.

    3) I can process my film then either enlarge the image using a traditional silver print or scan and print.

    4) When I'm editing my pictures for that day I only need search through 12 or 36 images on a roll of negatives to find I just shot junk, rather than hundreds perhaps thousands.

    5) Since I needn't continually upgrade, I can become familiar with certain cameras. I doesn't really matter how thick headed I am, after 40 years with the same camera I can pretty well use it. I mean, whats to know about a Leica M2?; Shutter speed, aperture, film, focus.

    6) Film must be more permanent than electronic storage. I won't ague the point, but I will say that I have negatives of people that must be over 90 years old. So I personally know that film will last at least that.

    7) I can buy a lovely film camera, perhaps a Olympus Om-1, a Nikon FM, a Hasselblad 500CM, a Rolleiflex for much less than its digital counterpart. When and/or if I decide to sell said camera, I may get what I paid for it.

    8) The image from a $900.00 medium format film camera can pretty well kick the snot out of the images from a $10,000 digital thingamy. (this will change, but right now this is the case)

    9) I really like a good silver gelatin Black and White print done by someone who knows what they are doing, than what I have seen so far from a digital print.
     
  20. analogital

    analogital Member

    Messages:
    7
    Joined:
    May 15, 2011
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I use film only for BW because of the uniqueness of the photo.
    It is on the film as it is shot and doesnt need the electronic provessing from RGB to BW. For me this is more authentic.
     
  21. shootsingh

    shootsingh Member

    Messages:
    23
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Location:
    LONDON
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I think the discussion should be 'why we shoot digital'? its a bizare, ten years old medium but the one from over a century needs justification.
     
  22. kevs

    kevs Member

    Messages:
    544
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    That's a fair point; it's akin to asking 'Why do you write letters with a fountain pen instead of e-mail?'

    IMO, if one has confidence in one's work, one certainly doesn't need to explain one's choice of medium. You wouldn't ask an artist why s/he chooses to sketch with charcoal and paper - a medium considerably older than photography - instead of a sketch tablet and laptop - would you?

    If the equipment is good, the medium is well-chosen and the result is fit for purpose, where's the problem? A better question might be 'Why should *anyone* need to justify his/her choice of medium?'. If one requires approval for one's choices, the problem is with the ego, not the medium.

    All IMO of course.

    Cheers,
    kevs.
     
  23. Thomas Bertilsson

    Thomas Bertilsson Subscriber

    Messages:
    15,205
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I really think that using film is a way to enjoy photography that you never can with digital. I don't knock digital as a technology at all - use it if you want to, as long as the pictures are good.
    But I LOVE film photography and darkroom printing, and I cannot bring myself to love digital capture or even film scanning. It is dull dull dull and boring boring boring. It's how it is. I find the groove under the safelight. The rest doesn't matter. Hopefully enough people will stay enthusiastic about it so we can continue to have film for a long time yet. Without film I would just quit.
     
  24. Bateleur

    Bateleur Member

    Messages:
    155
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Location:
    The Netherla
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Absolutely, a well founded choice of medium is a source of confidence leaving creativity as the sole recipient for energy and consideration.