Yasuhara T-981

Discussion in 'Rangefinder Forum' started by Stephanie Brim, Feb 8, 2006.

  1. Stephanie Brim

    Stephanie Brim Member

    Messages:
    1,607
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Location:
    Iowa
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I saw the price on the Lomography site and cringed. Granted, it's a pretty nice camera and that includes the lens, but I thought that they were cheaper than that originally. Can anyone tell me ANYTHING about this camera? I shot a PM to Stephen Gandy over on RFF to see if he could shed some light as to whether or not he has some left over.
     
  2. polaski

    polaski Member

    Messages:
    104
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Shooter:
    35mm
    The price is very much out of line

    The research I did into the Yasuhara indicated that the man wanted to produce a Leica-type rangefinder, and let the design and production costs get seriously out of control.

    Consina stole the guy's march by reengineering a cheap, proven SLR body into a rangefinder body. I have a CV Bessa R with Leica thread mount Cosina (CV) lenses and they all perform very well together at 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of equivilent used Leica equipment. (The word "equivilent" would upset Leica Forum members, but when I can get 85% of the quality for 35% of the price, it's a no brainer. Gandy goes into that in detail.)

    Were the Lomography folks marketing the Asuhara? If so, he's running out of marketing channels.
     
  3. Stephanie Brim

    Stephanie Brim Member

    Messages:
    1,607
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Location:
    Iowa
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Yes.

    If I'm going to get a Leica mount rangefinder it's going to be an actual Leica. This would have just been yet another body for my Russian lenses. But not at $600. I'm pondering saving for an M body now...seems to be the best way to go. Most likely an M3.

    I'm a Leicaphile myself. I know the Voigtlander equipment is good, but when I can get an M3 for the same amount used as a new R2/3A, I don't really see why I shouldn't get the Leica.
     
  4. Paul Sorensen

    Paul Sorensen Member

    Messages:
    1,897
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Location:
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Keep in mind that the Lomography folks try to sell a color flash Holga for $70 when freestyle sells it for $35. (They do throw in a roll of film and two AA batteries for the extra $35:smile:) There might be a less expensive source out there.
     
  5. Stephanie Brim

    Stephanie Brim Member

    Messages:
    1,607
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Location:
    Iowa
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Asked Stephen Gandy and he hasn't seen anymore. He also says that they suffer from light leaks...maybe they *were* made for the Lomo crowd. :tongue:
     
  6. Lachlan Young

    Lachlan Young Member

    Messages:
    719
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    According to Stephen Gandy the Copal shutter on the Yasuhara is not entirely light tight - unlike the cosina voigtlander which uses a double shutter to ensure light tightness. Apparently this is a problem which only afflicts focal plane metal shutters - cloth Leica type shutters are unaffected. I would suggest buying a Voigtlander instead.

    Hope this helps,
    Lachlan
     
  7. Uncle Bill

    Uncle Bill Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,380
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Oakville and
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Stephanie,
    At $600+Us I would just hold off save more money and get a Leica M3. Then again I am biased as I have an M3.

    Bill