Quote:
Originally Posted by jstraw  I'm not following you. Do you think magazines that review products pay the manufacturers for the privilege of displaying images of them? They don't. |
For obtaining the use of their (manufacturers') properties, I thought the magazines and/or any professional (meaning commercial-business) reviewers out there had to... I got confused (and pretty much still am) because I thought I heard, in some "copyright" issue, photographers have a risk of being sued violating the right when they sell their photo images, even street snaps taken in 100 percent pubic, that show some companies' logos, names of businesses. Or at least the photographers may be asked to stop or remove the logos and names, etc. And that logic seems to apply for almost any photographying and publishing without obtaining permission, consensus, or agreement, etc.