View Single Post
Old 06-23-2007, 07:25 PM   #16 (permalink)
copake_ham
 
copake_ham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC or Copake or Tucson
Posts: 4,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snegron View Post
......
Another time I had an "advanced ameteaur" who professed knowing everything about photography tell me after eagerly showing him my brand new Pentax K1000 that this camera was obsolete and that I would not be able to create anything good with that camera. After all, automated cameras were all the rage back then. Had I listened to this bozo I would have never developed any significant photographic skills relying heavily on automation. I would have never developed my interest in having total control in the image making process.
This point really caught my eye because it very much explains what really bugged me about David Pogue's column in Thursday's NY Times.

For those who don't know, Mr. Pogue writes the digi camera column that appears m/l every week in the Thursday "Technology" section of the NYT. What was bizarre was that his "point" in this past Thursday's column was that there are now DSLR's that can enable you to "shoot like a pro".

Say what?

Since when did any camera enable you to "shoot like a pro"?

AA, HCB, Arbus etc. etc. (add your favorite) all used manual cameras - when it comes down to it, according to Pogue, I guess each and every one didn't "shoot like a pro"!
copake_ham is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum