Yes, I have to agree that there was a very worrying amount of d******. And not only that, but a number of examples of typical incredulous digital evangelist type rubbish, which is always a very bad sign. Lets hope the new editor stops the rot.
One example that made me laugh: "the imaging performance of even modest (current) DSLRs is spectacularly good measured ... against the current DSLR state of the art". Or to interpret, the standard of the inferior examples of a group are greater than the average of the group. I don't know if something was lost in the translation from American, but its still b******s.
And this was from a columinst who recently suggested that the quality of digital prints should not be compared to silver prints because they are completely different things and hence the comparison is meaningless.
Steve |