Roger said this, "My point is this: I see no advantage in performing such a test under the artificial constraints of taking the same picture twice. What is the objection to shooting the two films alternately, taking real pictures of real subjects (not empty 'tests') and seeing which, on average, you prefer? The latter makes far more sense to me. What advantage do you (or does anyone else) see in the OP's approach".
So, it is just testing that you don't like? The OP said he was gonna take "real" pictures and "SEE" which one he liked. How is this an "empty test". It looks like to me that the posts agreeing with the OP are running about everyone agreeing that this would be ok with the exception of YOU Roger. You say you are not trying to be combative but it surely appears that way to me.
lee\c |