View Single Post
Old 09-19-2007, 03:12 PM   #116 (permalink)
roteague
 
roteague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankB View Post
As a non-fickle buyer of every issue and a constant subscriber since Issue 4, I really would like to know (3rd and final time of asking now!) is the new (a la Issue 77) ratio of digital to traditional in the magazine here to stay?
I don't think anyone could really answer that question without the ability to be able to look into the future. The fact is, digital is the predominate force in photography these days - we may not like it, but it is the reality. No magazine can ignore this, and still survive on the bookstore shelves - not only woudn't it sell, the distributors probably woudn't carry it.

Having said all that, I'm glad that David has stated a firm stance on keeping some film in the magazine. I buy a lot of issues, not every one, as I pointed out before I don't buy it if there is too much digital content - the magazine is a lot more expensive for me here in the US.

David, I have bought and plan to continue buying your magazine, because I appreciate your commitment to film. Keep in mind, 99.9% of my work is in color - in fact, I have not shot a single B&W image in almost a year. But, I still like your magazine.
__________________
Robert M. Teague
www.visionlandscapes.com
www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

"A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer
roteague is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum