[Soeren]

I agree here. In the October issue there is a small info box noting that out of 3000 asked pros in europe 67% will continue to use film.
Lets say the B&W analogue entusiast is about 10% of the intire amount of Photomag readers. Does that mean that every mag should have 10% covering that them or that 1 in 10 mags should specialize in B&W analogue?
I remember the review of the Bronica RF645. In the start it was asked why bring out a MF rangefinder? For the same reason you have B&W magazine. There is a need for it. The need for RF645 where not enough to keep it here. Is the need for B&W magazine? I really do believe so.
People may think they want more reviews, more PS and more on D-printing but what if you give it to them and they find out they don't need that anyway and they can have it in Amateur Photography, Popular Photography, Digital Photography, Fotomagazin, Outdoor Photography etc???
Kind regards
Søren