Lots of good suggestions have been made on this thread for changes to the magazine - some nice ideas and I'm glad that David is able to take the time to consider to them.
However, I do feel there is a danger that this thread has somehow wandered from a slight annoyance to the change of angle during the past 2 publications of the magazine (the "Editorless" issues) to a kind of "David has arrived, now we can get on with the REAL work" This attitude, that appears to be emerging here, ignores the brilliant work Ailsa did in editing the magazine - most people were quite happy with it when she was in control.
If, through David's editorship the magazine changes but continues to be equally as good, that is more than enough for me to keep buying. |