Quote:
Originally Posted by pentaxuser  ...There may well have been evidence from questionnaires /focus groups backing this decision. On the other hand if it was a "gut reaction" or change for change's sake because the "new broom was sweeping" then I get worried about the future of any magazine run on this basis.
pentaxuser |
Another view: I may be wrong but surely it is the editor's job to make these types of changes - using gut reaction or whatever other judgement tools they can bring to the task. This seems to me evidence of an editor editing and would not worry me in and of itself.