PDA

View Full Version : It's official, Kodak is selling its film business.



Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Thomas Bertilsson
08-24-2012, 09:40 AM
My experience is the digital 'enhancements' produce more artifact and false-positive findings.
Conclusion from the following paper: "Observer enhanced Sidexis [digital dental] images exhibited a statistically significant lower diagnostic accuracy than the film images."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16296430

My dentist, who likes and embraces new technology, complains that the new digital X-ray pictures are more difficult to read.
There is no question, however, that once the initial investment in equipment is done, running costs are lower, and profit is higher.

cdkrenzer
08-24-2012, 09:43 AM
So why is Kodak Professional on Facebook saying the opposite?

"Kodak Professional: Yes, the full still film line, including PORTRA, EKTAR and TRI-X falls within the Personal Imaging Business."

https://www.facebook.com/kodakprofessional

I tried to post last night and hopefully it gets cleared - so I'm sorry for the lag. I'm Colleen Krenzer and I work with the PR agency for Kodak's film and paper business and will try to answer questions people have as this process moves forward. All the still photography films are part of the sale. When Kodak says commercial films, it means films that are used in things like aerial, industrial and printed circuit boards.

That said, manufacturing on all products continues, including those ones included in the proposed sale.

BrianShaw
08-24-2012, 09:44 AM
My dentist, who likes and embraces new technology, complains that the new digital X-ray pictures are more difficult to read.

Mine did too, until he bought new monitors.

BrianShaw
08-24-2012, 09:46 AM
Thanks Colleen... and welcome to APUG. This is really a nice bunch of people.

lxdude
08-24-2012, 09:46 AM
Welcome, Colleen.

Ken Nadvornick
08-24-2012, 10:01 AM
I'm Colleen Krenzer and I work with the PR agency for Kodak's film and paper business and will try to answer questions people have as this process moves forward.

Welcome to APUG. Glad to see you took Dan's suggestion. The people over here are a tougher audience, but by and large they mean well. Thanks in advance for any additional clarity you may be able to bring to this situation. The more facts people have, the less rampant and unfounded speculation there will be.

Ken

Thomas Bertilsson
08-24-2012, 10:10 AM
Mine did too, until he bought new monitors.

High end monitors at that. But whatever. Let's talk about Kodak.

NB23
08-24-2012, 10:11 AM
Thanks for what? We've been asking questions for at least 10 years with absolutely no communication from kodak. Very simole things such as "why does kodak give erroneous hc110 development times for trix a d plusx", causing hundreds of underdevrloped films and hundreds of lost hours testing and searching the net for a right answer. And that was only a simple question.

Now that the fish is dead and badly stinking you finally appear? For what exactly? To inform us on the sale?

This is hypocrisy at the highest degree. Kodak is decidedly dedicated to ridicule its customers 'til the last second. That's how I see it.

Thomas Bertilsson
08-24-2012, 10:12 AM
I tried to post last night and hopefully it gets cleared - so I'm sorry for the lag. I'm Colleen Krenzer and I work with the PR agency for Kodak's film and paper business and will try to answer questions people have as this process moves forward. All the still photography films are part of the sale. When Kodak says commercial films, it means films that are used in things like aerial, industrial and printed circuit boards.

That said, manufacturing on all products continues, including those ones included in the proposed sale.

Thank you for posting here, Colleen! And welcome to APUG. I really want to applaud your effort to come here and speak on behalf of Kodak. It has long been a sore point with many members here, that while Ilford and ADOX openly communicate to the forums, we got silence from Kodak. Perhaps we overestimated our importance, but all the same it's wonderful to get quality inside information. Thank you!

Thomas Bertilsson
08-24-2012, 10:13 AM
Thanks for what? We've been asking questions for at least 10 years with absolutely no communication from kodak. Very simole things such as "why does kodak give erroneous hc110 development times for trix a d plusx", causing hundreds of underdevrloped films and hundreds of lost hours testing and searching the net for a right answer. And that was only a simple question.

Now that the fish is dead and badly stinking you finally appear? For what exactly? To inform us on the sale?

This is hypocrisy at the highest degree. Kodak is decidedly dedicated to ridicule its customers 'til the last second. That's how I see it.

Nice way to welcome someone who is trying to give us solid information about what's going on.

NB23
08-24-2012, 10:17 AM
I'm entitled to my view.

Kodak's insulted me enough through the years. They didn't care about me (us) until now. And suddenly they do? Eehh

Simonh82
08-24-2012, 10:18 AM
Thanks Colleen, we appreciate any communication. Now back to the important stuff. What is your opinion of Digial dental X-Ray technology? I assume this was the question you woke up thinking about this morning.

Steve Smith
08-24-2012, 10:23 AM
Thanks Colleen, we appreciate any communication. Now back to the important stuff. What is your opinion of Digial dental X-Ray technology? I assume this was the question you woke up thinking about this morning.

The best thing about is is that you can Photoshop in missing teeth or clone out bad or broken teeth. Much cheaper than the traditional methods!


Steve.

zsas
08-24-2012, 10:25 AM
Colleen welcome to APUG! I appreciate your postings and look forward to hearing more from you!

Diapositivo
08-24-2012, 10:28 AM
I'm Colleen Krenzer and I work with the PR agency for Kodak's film and paper business and will try to answer questions people have as this process moves forward.

All the still photography films are part of the sale. When Kodak says commercial films, it means films that are used in things like aerial, industrial and printed circuit boards.

That said, manufacturing on all products continues, including those ones included in the proposed sale.

First of all, thanks for being here.

Second, not directed to Colleen: Ms Krenzer works for a Public Relations agency which at the moment works for Kodak. She or her agency have nothing to do for the bad communication from Kodak in the past. The fact that one person is participating in internet fora to explain what happens is I think a solid testimony that communication from Kodak has now improved. For many, many posts people have complained that there wasn't someone from Kodak participating in fora interacting with final users of the products. Well, at last, we have that someone! Time to rejoice not to grumble about the past.

Third, a question:
Still photography film is part of the sale;
Commercial film is film used in aerial, industrial and printed circuit board, and is not part of the sale;
The question arises: where does motion picture film sits in the picture? Is it part of the sale?

Thanks in advance
Fabrizio

jnanian
08-24-2012, 10:30 AM
Thanks for what? We've been asking questions for at least 10 years with absolutely no communication from kodak. Very simole things such as "why does kodak give erroneous hc110 development times for trix a d plusx", causing hundreds of underdevrloped films and hundreds of lost hours testing and searching the net for a right answer. And that was only a simple question.



all times given for all developers for all films, no matter the brand &c are starting points.
there are countless threads here, and books written on this subject

maybe instead of harassing a PR firm representative about
your problems processing film, you should read a bit on the subject instead.

Thomas Bertilsson
08-24-2012, 10:30 AM
I'm entitled to my view.

Kodak's insulted me enough through the years. They didn't care about me (us) until now. And suddenly they do? Eehh

So you don't like to give someone that's trying to do something good a chance? Like there is no way to redemption. That is sad.

Ken Nadvornick
08-24-2012, 10:30 AM
I'm entitled to my view.

Kodak's insulted me enough through the years. They didn't care about me (us) until now. And suddenly they do? Eehh

Knock it off. This isn't all about you.

I want to hear what Colleen has to say. I'd bet so do a lot of others here. Don't you dare ruin it for the rest of us. You are entitled to hold and express and listen to opinions as you see fit. But only insofar as your behavior does not preclude the rest of us from enjoying and exercising that same freedom.

Ken

Steve Smith
08-24-2012, 10:31 AM
I want to hear what Colleen has to say.

So do I.


Steve.

zsas
08-24-2012, 10:35 AM
Time to rejoice not to grumble about the past
Fabrizio - Well said!