bogeyes
06-15-2007, 05:09 AM
I am hanging my nose over a very cheap Vivitar series 1 135mm f2.3 lens (less than £30). Its serial number suggest that it was manufactured by Komine. Have any of you out there used such a lens? Opinions please.
| View Full Version : Vivitar series 1 lens opinions bogeyes 06-15-2007, 05:09 AM I am hanging my nose over a very cheap Vivitar series 1 135mm f2.3 lens (less than £30). Its serial number suggest that it was manufactured by Komine. Have any of you out there used such a lens? Opinions please. David H. Bebbington 06-15-2007, 05:37 AM I think in general that the Series 1 lenses were the best that Vivitar made. I had a Series 1 macro lens once (either 90 or 105 mm, can't remember) which was excellent. Regards, David luvcameras 06-15-2007, 06:30 AM It was considered a fine lens in its day ( late 70's ). Not sure how it will compare to more modern designs, but for that amount of money, its a good deal Dan Mick Fagan 06-15-2007, 07:51 AM I had that exact lens about 1982 for my Nikon's. It was a brilliant lens, slightly heavy and the winding back and forth required a fair bit of screwing, it certainly will not go from infinity to close focus in 1/2 a twist. I think it used a 72mm filter thread. Somewhere, I have the original little booklet that came with it. Very nice lens and made quite a lot of good pictures for me it when I had it. The Vivitar Series 1 lenses and Sigma Series II were for me, the only aftermarket lenses I considered reasonably close quality wise compared to Nikkor. Especially when you consider they were under 1/2 the price of Nikkor lenses but weren't 1/2 the quality. I still run three Sigma lenses, 18 3.5, 24 2.8, 600 8 (mirror) Mick. Roger Hicks 06-15-2007, 07:54 AM I am hanging my nose over a very cheap Vivitar series 1 135mm f2.3 lens (less than £30). Its serial number suggest that it was manufactured by Komine. Have any of you out there used such a lens? Opinions please. Get it. It's gorgeous, as are all first-series Series 1 primes. At that price I'd seriously consider buying it as a spare. The 200/3 is even nicer. Both focus incredibly close. I also have the 90/2.5 and 600/8, and used to have the 28/1.9 (a friend REALLY wanted it) and 800/11 (too slow, and too close to the 600/8). Actually the 35-85/2.8 Varifocal is astonishingly good too, though the 90-180/4.5 close-focus shows its age compared with primes and more modern designs (I have both those too...) Cheers, Roger Uncle Bill 06-15-2007, 11:22 AM I have a Kiron made Series 1 75-210 for my OM kit and it is really nice lens. I plan to get some for my Nikon and Minolta MCx kits. geauxpez 06-15-2007, 11:39 AM I have a Kiron made Series 1 75-210 for my OM kit and it is really nice lens. I plan to get some for my Nikon and Minolta MCx kits. I also have a Kiron made Series 1 for my OM, the 28-90 -- fantastic lens. David A. Goldfarb 06-15-2007, 11:43 AM I also have the [...] 600/8, and used to have the [...] 800/11 (too slow, and too close to the 600/8). Cheers, Roger Were/are these the solid cats? I've always heard good things about these. They also had a fast mirror lens, like 450mm/f:4.5 if I remember, and I think it used plastic in some then-innovative way. Did you ever try that one? donbga 06-15-2007, 11:44 AM I also have a Kiron made Series 1 for my OM, the 28-90 -- fantastic lens. I have a 76 to 210 for sale if anyone is interested. Roger Hicks 06-15-2007, 12:55 PM Were/are these the solid cats? I've always heard good things about these. They also had a fast mirror lens, like 450mm/f:4.5 if I remember, and I think it used plastic in some then-innovative way. Did you ever try that one? Dear David, Yes, they're solid cats. I used to have a 680/6.8 prototype too but gave it to a friend. He died and I believe another friend inherited it. The 450/4.5 was probably not available commercially (there are different views about this) and did I believe use plasric, but the 600/8 and 800/11 solid cats used glass, not plastic, for the light path. Cheers, roger Kiron Kid 06-16-2007, 02:13 AM Bogeyes Over the last couple of decades, I've inadvertently become somewhat of an authority on Vivitar & Kiron glass. Please feel free to contact me about any Viv or Kiron lenses, and I'll give you the scoop on any of them. The Viv S-1, 135mm f/2.3 that you are asking about, is a very good one. Not great, but very good. And Komine produced some of the best Viv S-1 lenses ever made. I think that you'll be quite satisfied with it's results. Kiron Kidn ( MrVivSeries1) bogeyes 06-16-2007, 02:00 PM Bogeyes Over the last couple of decades, I've inadvertently become somewhat of an authority on Vivitar & Kiron glass. Please feel free to contact me about any Viv or Kiron lenses, and I'll give you the scoop on any of them. The Viv S-1, 135mm f/2.3 that you are asking about, is a very good one. Not great, but very good. And Komine produced some of the best Viv S-1 lenses ever made. I think that you'll be quite satisfied with it's results. Kiron Kidn ( MrVivSeries1)Thanks for the offer. wiggy 08-04-2007, 02:32 PM Perhaps someone here can shed some light on my favourite lens which I've had since 1976. It's marked up as a Vivitar Series 1 200mm but f2.8 rather than the f3.0 which seems to be usually mentioned. It was picked up in Japan in June 1976 and brought back for me by a family friend along with an AE1 body for the princely sum of £180.00 which seemed like a lot of money at the time. |