Steve Smith
06-05-2008, 08:00 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/05/news.terrorism
A refreshing change to the usual alarmist stuff.
Steve.
A refreshing change to the usual alarmist stuff.
Steve.
| View Full Version : Are photoghraphers really a threat? Pages :
[1]
2 Steve Smith 06-05-2008, 08:00 AM http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/05/news.terrorism A refreshing change to the usual alarmist stuff. Steve. bobwysiwyg 06-05-2008, 08:11 AM Sadly, the passage and enforcement of the Patriot Act in the U.S. makes any wallet sized document moot. You can flash it to anyone who happens by your detention cell. Uhner 06-05-2008, 09:31 AM Refreshing indeed. pentaxuser 06-05-2008, 02:01 PM Refreshing indeed but it won't last. A bit of wisdom and truth from one newspaper against all the might of most of rest of the tabloid media. No contest. pentaxuser gr82bart 06-15-2008, 09:57 AM http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/05/news.terrorism An article on a groundless we fear we already knew. Regards, Art. Ian Grant 06-15-2008, 10:03 AM You're a bit late that link's been posted here before. So it's old news. I'm more worried by the subversives who post on APUG :D Ian DannL 06-15-2008, 10:15 AM Whenever I want to see a picture of something I just Google it. Don't the bad guys have internet access? :D . . . or you can Google Earth it. David A. Goldfarb 06-15-2008, 11:09 AM Threads merged. Andy K 06-15-2008, 12:36 PM ... I don't think so. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v223/Minitar1/Dg/Photurrrist2.jpg Ian Leake 06-15-2008, 12:58 PM http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v223/Minitar1/Dg/Photurrrist2.jpg This guy looks very dodgy. Perhaps we should only be worried about medium format photographers? ;) Christopher Walrath 06-15-2008, 01:07 PM I'm not a threat. Unless you're between me and my chili cheese dog. gr82bart 06-24-2008, 11:53 PM The war on photography (not to mention diplomacy and civility) continues ... this article, if true, angers me the more I think about it. http://www.episcopalcafe.com/daily/war_and_peace/every_day_diplomacy.php Regards, Art. gr82bart 06-24-2008, 11:56 PM The madness continues ... I'm waiting for the little red book to be passed out to each citizen to turn in their neighbours who have photographic projects. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/arts/design/20shat.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1210 125984-qrPPfpI/kDlEi+wMrOvtEA&oref=slogin Regards, Art. gr82bart 06-24-2008, 11:57 PM Even the Aussies have adopted the madness ... http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23553587-952,00.html Regards, Art. gr82bart 06-24-2008, 11:59 PM Hmm ... when the economy is this bad, do we really want to harass tourists by equating all of them to terrorists? http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Content?oid=oid%3A41348 Regards, Art. walter23 06-24-2008, 11:59 PM Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography. Photographers have been harrassed, questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We've been repeatedly told to watch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required. Sometimes I wonder if this isn't a matter of the FBI and CIA and such powers confusing photographers with terrorists as much as willful and diabolical preludes to the stifling of photojournalism and the press. A test run, so to speak, for someone's fascist plans. Just the paranoiac in the corner of my mind speaking here, but it makes some amount of sense. Look at how photographers have been treated by police departments lately, for example, and imagine a hypothetical scenario whereby police are mistreating some individual and the press is trying to photograph it. gr82bart 06-25-2008, 12:09 AM Well, it's official according to the US Coast Guard, we're all to be reported for suspicious activity ... the little red book on the net? http://www.uscg.mil/d5/sector/delawarebay/Suspicious_Activity.htm Regards, Art. gr82bart 06-25-2008, 12:16 AM Look at how photographers have been treated by police departments lately, for example, and imagine a hypothetical scenario whereby police are mistreating some individual and the press is trying to photograph it.Maybe you aren't paranoid after all. One photographer fights back ... http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004003761_photographer09m.html Regards, Art. gr82bart 06-25-2008, 12:29 AM Well, now this is just comedy if true ... http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/1833 Regards, Art. gr82bart 06-25-2008, 12:34 AM What can I say? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/24/AR2007092401521.html?sub=new Regards, Art. Ian Leake 06-25-2008, 01:57 AM We see the same nonsense over here. When our society abandons its values of freedom, self expression and openness, the people who hate these values have won. The West didn't win the Cold War by spying on its population, interning foreigners without trial, and giving authoritarian powers to every uniformed thug and bully. We won because our system is inherently stronger and more enduring than Communism was. Education, wealth and freedom of speech are far more powerful weapons in the clash of cultures than uniforms and cluster bombs. The morally corrupt politicians who play on our fears by exaggerating the threat of "terrorism" for narrow political advantage have a lot to answer for. nc5p 06-27-2008, 09:01 PM I get so mad about this stuff. But as mad as I get, I have a professional job for a major company, a house to pay for, a wife, and three kids to support. All those would be taken away if I did what I really wanted to. So my camera stays at home in the drawer. I get it out to photograph the sunset, clouds, or other sights from my own home. But I don't go out "looking for trouble" anymore. There's just too much to lose at this stage in life. I believe that's were they have us all. Just try to get an engineering job after being convicted of assaulting a police officer. The goons win every time. I believe many other people are in the same boat. We don't stand up to the filthy goons like the ones on that train because we know the price we will pay. So they keep on doing their dirty deeds. Someday I hope they shall pay. JLMoore3rd 06-27-2008, 09:34 PM Brings to mind this Wikipedia page: First, they came... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...) "In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist; And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist; And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew; And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up." Steve Hamley 06-30-2008, 05:45 PM Here's a link to Bruce Schneier's Cryptogram (security) newsletter, which contains an excellent article on the current photographic paranoia. http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0806.html Cheers, Steve David A. Goldfarb 06-30-2008, 06:56 PM That's the same article as the one that appeared in the Guardian recently, so I've merged the two threads. The version that Steve Hamley posted contains many useful links as well. |