Andy K
09-30-2009, 04:03 PM
To be clear, what you are saying is that you do not accept digital photography as being photography, because it has quality issues.
Which becomes a problem when the quality issues go away.
(And there is no reason to assume they cannot.)
It is very relevant though, since it highlights what is wrong with digital photography.
Something which is real, and more important than futile attempts of finding a stricter, more narrow redefiniton of something we understand, only to exclude something we may not like for non-related reasons.
What does the OED say about photography and quality?
Is using a Holga - with film in it - photography?
Such an expert... and yet nothing in the gallery to show for it? Ever heard the expression 'Talks a good game...'
Which becomes a problem when the quality issues go away.
(And there is no reason to assume they cannot.)
It is very relevant though, since it highlights what is wrong with digital photography.
Something which is real, and more important than futile attempts of finding a stricter, more narrow redefiniton of something we understand, only to exclude something we may not like for non-related reasons.
What does the OED say about photography and quality?
Is using a Holga - with film in it - photography?
Such an expert... and yet nothing in the gallery to show for it? Ever heard the expression 'Talks a good game...'