When did Kodak start to discontinue it's films?

[RGS122]

Did it start after 2000? I was wondering because I have Ektachrome 160T that was expired in 2005 and I have Elite Chrome 160T that was expired in 2003. They surely don't make these anymore and I was wondering when they started the cuts. Also what other types of film did they carried?

[wiltw]

Kodak has always been discontinuing films, as new technology in emulsions would outdate one emulsion and be replaced by another one.

If you are asking about films dropping in demand and being discontinued due to the advent of digital, that particular phenomenon probably came about when 35mm film could adequately be replaced by digital image quality for digital cameras to replace film cameras for most uses, at reasonable cost...about 6-7 years ago.

[Tom Kershaw]

Kodak has always been discontinuing films, as new technology in emulsions would outdate one emulsion and be replaced by another one.

If you are asking about films dropping in demand and being discontinued due to the advent of digital, that particular phenomenon probably came about when 35mm film could adequately be replaced by digital image quality for digital cameras to replace film cameras for most uses, at reasonable cost...about 6-7 years ago.

Although with careful attention to detail one can get excellent quality from 35mm.

[Photo Engineer]

The biggest drop in sales of all analog products world-wide came in about 2005. This is when Ilford and Agfa underwent their problems, and Kodak discontinued the manufacture of all B&W papers. There was about a 35% drop in one single quarter alone.

PE

[Ektagraphic]

black and white currently seem to be doing pretty well from all I have gathered so I wonder if Kodak regrets giving up the black and white paper.....

[Photo Engineer]

Well, when I asked Antonio Perez face to face a similar question he replied "Ron, we were hemorrhaging out of the paper business and it just could not continue." At that time, there was no upswing visible that would sustain the large effort in making and coating paper. Film was strong, but paper was poor in sales.

[Tom Kershaw]

Ron,

Do you have any thoughts on the disconnect between Kodak film and paper sales?

Tom

[Photo Engineer]

Not a clue Tom and it seems that no one at Kodak does either. It is one of those imponderable events that confounds everyone. B&W film sales at EK remain strong from what I hear. B&W paper sales fell to abysmal levels. Maybe it was the huge product range? They did have trouble supporting all of those paper types.

PE

[fotch]

Maybe the shift to scanning rather than printing cause the drop in paper sales. At first glance, many may have thought it the way to go. Seems like the comment "returning to the darkroom" is becoming more common now a days.

Just a thought.

[tim elder]

I've only been printing for about a decade, but Kodak's black & white paper never seemed popular to me; almost everyone around me was always using Ilford or Agfa paper, even though I never got a real reason for people's dislike of it. I wasn't that surprised when they dropped it.

-Tim

[SchwinnParamount]

I don't understand the disconnect either. My favorite paper has been Polymax Fine Art and I've been buying old stock when I could get it. A decent alternative is the Ilford papers of course.

[RGS122]

Thanks for answering my question, I was talking about the whole digital thing, it appears that 2004 was the year then. I wish that I got into film before 2004, but then I was only a teenager. Now I'm close to 20 and care about it now, to me it seems a little too late. But at least I get to shoot Kodachrome and get to shoot some of the old stock that is left.

[MattKing]

Thanks for answering my question, I was talking about the whole digital thing, it appears that 2004 was the year then. I wish that I got into film before 2004, but then I was only a teenager. Now I'm close to 20 and care about it now, to me it seems a little too late. But at least I get to shoot Kodachrome and get to shoot some of the old stock that is left.

It's not old stock.

Kodak still makes a wide variety of film. There are new films (Ektar 100), recently improved films (TMY-2), films that reflect continuing evolutionary improvements (the Portra series) and films that have been at least "tweaked" in recent years (Tri-X 400).

And they still sell a lot of film, although certainly not as much as in the past.

In case you haven't already gone there, here is a link to that part of Kodak's site that deals with their "Professional" films:

http://wwwcaen.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/filmsIndex.jhtml?pq-path=13319

Matt

[RGS122]

Ya I've been there, but I guess I should have been more specific, when I mean old stock, I mean the E-6 slide films they've discontinued. Such as Ektachrome in 100, 100 plus, 160T, 320T, and 400X. As for black and white, HIE and Technical Pan.

[photomem]

I have about 800 shts of a 1000 sheet supply of Kodak Polycontrast IV RC. I wish Kodak still made this paper. I think that I might start looking for old stock to freeze, I love it.

[B&Wpositive]

It began in the late 1990s. The loss of selections started to happen big-time in the early to mid 2000s. I think Verichrome Pan was one of the first classic, highly-sought after films to go after many years of stabilized availability, around 2002.

[RGS122]

It began in the late 1990s. The loss of selections started to happen big-time in the early to mid 2000s. I think Verichrome Pan was one of the first classic, highly-sought after films to go after many years of stabilized availability, around 2002.

Thanks for the information.

[PhotoBob]

One Kodak paper I miss is the Elite Fine-Art.

[Tom Kershaw]

One Kodak paper I miss is the Elite Fine-Art.

Wasn't Kodak Elite a graded cool tone paper?

Tom

[Donmck]

If I had to pick a milestone--

1999---Kodak discontinues 126 film

"Elvis has left the building"

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=ek&sid=0&o_symb=ek&freq=2&time=20