hell...I can't see it ....
post it with arrows maybe...
but it you use tubes...sure as shitiuh...you got anti-halation dye problems on the back...it LOOKS like emulsion, but it ain't...done it...been there
Printable View
hell...I can't see it ....
post it with arrows maybe...
but it you use tubes...sure as shitiuh...you got anti-halation dye problems on the back...it LOOKS like emulsion, but it ain't...done it...been there
I use the JOBO CPP2 processor with the large film drum.
I agree to use a longer development time, with the appropriately more dilute developer. I experienced streaking when reducing my development times to control contrast, using BTZS tubes. I was developing between 4 and 5 minutes with D-76 1:1. I have changed to D-76 1:3 and processing around 11 minutes with Tri-X at 70 deg F. No streaks so far using the longer process time and more dilute developer.
increasing the time sometimes helps, but not always--it's a crapshoot depending on the fickle forces in the tube..if you go back and look on the film very closely, you'll see the streaking--but light streaking doesn't affect anything if you're printing--I do reversals--so you SEE this stuff on a light table if it's there--therefore it's completely unacceptable.
what will give MORE reliable success than increasing the time is MORE solution--it provides more presssure to get the liquid in back quickly and more evenly---however even this can't prevent it from happening in my experience--not if the back of the film is pressed against the tube--there will always be uneven wetting back there most of the time.
Thanks, everyone!!!