<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>APUG - Blogs - Ole</title>
		<link>http://www.apug.org/forums/blogs/ole/</link>
		<description>APUG.ORG is an international on-line community, completely devoted to traditional (non-digital) photographic processes.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:27:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>5</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Blogging again?</title>
			<link>http://www.apug.org/forums/blogs/ole/17-blogging-again.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I was never too good at updating the blog under the previous system - in fact I believe it only ever came to two entries. But that's no reason not to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="blogcontent restore">I was never too good at updating the blog under the previous system - in fact I believe it only ever came to two entries. But that's no reason not to try again, is it?<br />
<br />
I've been in the darkroom again today. As I suspected i had put off cleaning up the last time I was there, and had ended up going offshore for a week in the interim. It's amazing how <i>hard</i> solidified print developer can get, and how long it takes to get it out of the tray. :(<br />
<br />
I have a lot of negatives to print, but today's priority was making prints for the upcoming toning workshop with Tim Rudman in Dublin this weekend. So I chose to print an old familiar negative, originally shot with a Zeiss Ikon 521 MF folder. It is also about the closest I've ever come to &quot;street photography&quot;, although it is equally a &quot;landscape&quot;. It's just that there are people in it for a change, four Japanese tourists who were completely unaware that they were being photographed.<br />
<br />
So I made 15 prints in all, on four different papers, all in &quot;small size&quot;. For some reason I've come to view 8x10&quot; as &quot;small&quot; for enlargements, although it's certainly large for a camera? I usually print on 24x30cm paper, and that is significantly larger than 8x10&quot; (20x25cm). But this time, as I just wrote, I'll be bringing the prints with me to Dublin where they will be dunked in various chemicals. So I decided to forego my customary 24x30cm FB prints for 8x10&quot; RC.<br />
<br />
I'll have to print the four tourists again, on a larger paper. <i>After</i> I've removed the hair that was on my negative throughout todays printing session - I didn't even notice until I put the prints in the drier!</blockquote>

]]></content:encoded>
			<dc:creator>Ole</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.apug.org/forums/blogs/ole/17-blogging-again.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

