# The Test Strip - a quick quote from Lootens

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 5 of 5 First 12345
• 11-21-2013, 12:50 AM
Bill Burk
I don't know, I didn't really double-check the math.

The next numbers of seconds in third-stops according to an old Master light meter, 40 - 50 - 64 - 80 - 100

Reciprocity failure is a factor to keep in mind.

I also believe the idea that you get consistent steps using f/stop printing breaks down a little when you change paper grades.

Because 1/3 stop "change" at Grade 2 is a gentle difference... While it's a rather dramatic difference at Grade 4.

Still I'd prefer f/stop differences than 5 - 10 - 15 - 20 - 25

p.s. I made the 11x14 print last night using Looten's 5 - 10 - 20 - 40 - 80, and it sort of caught me off guard. The vintage neg was kind of thin compared to my usual. I had to use f/22 to make that test strip.
• 11-21-2013, 05:22 AM
Doremus Scudder
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Burk
Doremus,

I think percentage timing is mathematically the same as f/stop timing... Look at your counts and mine... They're identical! I call mine 1/3 stop and you call yours 30%

Exactly! The only thing I don't have with percentages that you have with f-stop timing is the headache! :p

As Bob points out, the percentages and the stops are not exactly equivalent (and reciprocity failure is always a factor at longer times), however percentages are consistent and flexible and have all the advantages and none of the drawbacks of f-stop timing. I have two sequences, 20% and 30%, that I use for test strips and have simply memorized them. No programming, no math, nothing but counting seconds.

Seriously, it seems to me that so many f-stop timing schemes (and timers!) are overly-complicated for the task at hand. Percentages are easily figured and rounded, and I can just use my metronome to time with and watch my work. Plus I have the advantage that I can apply the same system to dodging and burning, which is rather difficult with f-stop timing (how do you dodge 1/3 stop anyway?).

And, when scaling a print up or down, I can find a base exposure and then use the percentages I've recorded to figure a starting point for manipulations for the new size. I say starting point because different size prints often require very different approaches to get the same "feel."

Best,

Doremus
• 11-21-2013, 10:56 AM
Bob Carnie
When I worked in the 80s doing huge murals we worked with a mag formulation that considered reciprocity , and therefore once we established a set time at one magnification
then we could calculate fstop differences without adjusting the timer unless in extreme changes.

Quite frankly I cannot tell you all how this was done today as my mind is old and feeble.

I am a strong proponent of keeping my times within 10 -18 seconds so that the math will work out in % 's, but since we all have different types of enlargers. and different types of negatives our times may vary.
I do use three bulbs on my enlargers .. 75w, 150 w and a 250 ww depending on the negative therefore keeping my times to the sweet spot as well keeping in the middle areas of my apeture without going to the extremes.
I have heard of some here doing 2 minute exposures which if find impractical.

I also utilize ND to lower the power of my 11 x14 and 8 x10 enlargers so that I am almost always in the sweet spot.

I just finished 4 different negatives for mural silver prints and was able to print at two stops down and between 12 and 16 seconds.
This way I can use predictable % printing as some here suggest to do.
Also I use glass carriers and will adjust the apeture once focused to change density if my time is in the sweet spot.
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 5 of 5 First 12345