It depends on the viewer and the intent of the artist.
Printable View
It depends on the viewer and the intent of the artist.
Damn I missed what happened here. Someone complained in the gallery?
I disagree with the "clearly" masturbating comment. The hands in the 35mm one were not defined enough to make that assertion, and the other just showed a woman with her hands covering herself. Emil has posted many images where his bromoil technique has "veiled" certain areas. I see it as a testament to his inking skills, as well as his sensitivity to his models and viewers.
Picture made me tingle in a naughty please.... MUST DESTROY! Please Grow Up.
I don't have a problem with Erotic, pornographic, nude or any of the above. There were one or two images that I have seen recently that did take me by suprise, but I wouldn't necessarily want them removed
But one thing I will make comment on.... Remove the artistic and creative treatment to the printing and they would have come straight out of Hustler. Now, it is up to you to decide whether that is a bad thing - me personally, I don't necessarily have a problem with that, but I know others that would.