I'd like to know how it is that as soon as a woman gets her tits out, photographic voyeurism is somehow coverted into art. Is it not true that the word art is used as a metaphor for voyeurism or erotic. So what exactly is "Fine Art" about photographing nudes? If this offends you, then console yourself in the knowledge that I'm too stupid to understand. Did I say console? Perhaps I meant delude.
To answer your question: no, it is not true that "the word art is used as a metaphor for voyeurism or erotic". Thousands of years of artistic endeavour from the fertility figures of pre-history to today's paintings, sculptures and photographs argue against that proposition.
I was pulling Art's leg above but the point is valid: there are a multitude of reasons, as others have also said, for a particular image and indeed voyeurism can be one of them, but it is not the only one.
Honi soit qui mal y pense...
A well-executed nude that uses light, posing and composition to provoke an aesthetic response that moves beyond the sexual is Fine Art. A pornographic image uses light, posing and composition to ensure that the only response is sexual.
Nudity and politics
I never understood why nudity is a big deal with you people.
Its a human being.
What's wrong with that?
And what's strange about a human being attracting the gaze of another?
What I find strange is to get a boner with a car or a video game, not with a nude fellow human.
...its how shrinks make easy money...
And Rob, you need to chill man.
You seem awfully aggressive and confrontational lately.
I hope life's good to you.