Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,696   Posts: 1,482,508   Online: 969
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Mystery Lens

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minnesota Tropics
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    735

    Mystery Lens

    I posted this to usenet a couple years ago, and am still looking for insites. Any information would be much appreciated. Thank you.

    http://elearning.winona.edu/jjs/mystery/

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,079
    Images
    20
    Ahhh, the famous "Mullett"...

    No idea, but it looks like a beautiful lens. Have you tried it out?
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    MattCarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,303
    Images
    31
    Wow, the only place I can find any reference to "Mullet Bros." is
    http://specialcollections.wichita.ed.../2002-8-b.html

    but you probably already have seen that.

    My only guess is that this is a rebranded lens. I.e. someone else made it--much like some of the stuff sold by Burke and James.

    Matt

  4. #4
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,368
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    154
    I know exactly what it is. Bausch and Lomb Optical made these about 1890 and later. They put a lot of other peoples names on them. I have 3. One says Eastman Kodak Co. One says SeRoCo (Sears Roebuck & Co.), and one says Hyatt. There was one on Ebay recently that didn't sell. It actually had the Bausch & Lomb name on it. The lens Collectors Vade Mecum has this paragraph about them:

    Universal Portrait f4.0 These seem to be a Petzval type made in:
    No(1) 6.5, with front glass 2.75in dia. for 5x4in.
    No(2) 8.5, with front glass 3.5in dia. for 5x8in.
    No(3) 11.5, with front glass 4.16in dia. for 6.5x8.5in.
    No(4) 13.5in with front glass 4.5in dia., for 8x10in.
    The separation of the rear glasses was adjustable to control softness, and this may be most useful in close-up
    as it increases the depth and eveness of definition.

    Interesting but mine are all #5 I guess as they are 16" f4. The rear groups should have a single line on the inner one and 4 lines on the outer one. You turn the outer one ccw until the lines line up for 1, 2, 3, &4 diffusion.

    They are a "Patent Petzval" type.

    Gorgeous lenses all.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minnesota Tropics
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    735
    Pardon if this is a repeat message. I’m messed up with a recently mauled hand, typing one-handed and really goofing up at the keyboard.

    Jim, I can’t thank you enough; after all these years I finally know what I have. It is exciting.

    If my other post did go through, I made an error in which I said that the “f-5” engraved on the body was wrong. Not so. I got the lens out of storage (it’s been that long) and it turns out the lens uses the defunct British Uniform System of apertures. This one has Uniform scale 1.5 to 64, which is approximately f5 to f32. So the USA folks put the accepted equivalent and engraved it accordingly.

    Again, my deepest appreciation for the information.

    John

  6. #6
    Paul Sorensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,895
    Images
    26
    Didn't the Mullet Brothers play minor league hockey in the 80s?

    http://www.blackaces.ca/top_ten_mullets.htm

  7. #7
    noseoil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,898
    Images
    17
    John, we still want to see a picture or two taken with the beast! tim

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Minnesota Tropics
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    735
    Quote Originally Posted by noseoil
    John, we still want to see a picture or two taken with the beast! tim
    My colleagues joke, but are correct, that I spend an inordinate amount of time making cameras, then spend one session using it, and put it into storage. The pictures from this lens via 4x5 teducing back went to the subject's mother, negs and all. I live in a tiny house now with no room to use the beast. Don't know if studio work is in my future, or how I could make it so.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin