Discussions: 44,939 | Messages: 605,803 | Members: 29,698 | Online: 215 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
828 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
367 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
787 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Antiques and Collecting > Zeiss Ikonta Tessar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2007, 08:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
glbeas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Roswell, Ga. USA
Posts: 2,877
Default Zeiss Ikonta Tessar

I have a Zeiss Ikonta 6x9 folder acquired for a pocketable shooter for casual hiking. The shutter seized up so I opened it up to give it a clean and lube. That was successful, and I noticed the Tessar lens accomplished its focusing with a front element that moved while another element behind it was stationary. Makes me think this thing focuses like the human eye by changing the focal length rather than changing the lens to film distance.
Anybody know the story on this?
__________________
Gary Beasley
glbeas is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-12-2007, 11:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Posts: 1,797
Default

I don't know the theory behind it, but a lot of folding cameras used "front element focusing" and it seems this was an economy move, as the camera did not have to have the mechanics to move forward and backward the front standard. I would imagine front element focusing is a compromise in image quality over unit focusing.
PHOTOTONE is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-12-2007, 11:48 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: istanbul
Posts: 236
Default

Glbeas , can you post few pictures with your camera.

William Henry Jackson and Ansel Adams both used zeiss tessar at 35 mm.

I want to own the camera but money is in the sky with cubic zirconium ..
Mustafa Umut Sarac is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-12-2007, 04:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
Ole
 
Ole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 8,618
Blog Entries: 1
Default

It's basic photographic optics really - changing the spacing of a compound lens changes the focal length.

One early anastigmat, the Steinheil Unofocal (the name isn't as dreadful in German as it is in English), originally consisted of four airspaced lens elements where all four elements had exactly the same focal length, except that two of them were negative. Without spacing the focal length would have been infinity!

That's also how zoom lenses work, except that there are a few more elements to keep the mount-to-focal-plane distance (more or less) constant.
__________________
-- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
Norway
Ole is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 12-12-2007, 04:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Misissauaga Canada
Posts: 624
Default a blurb on zeiss tessar

http://www.zeiss.com/C125716F004E0776/0/3E640231096E4B6AC125717500672495/$File/Innovation_11_32.pdf

I found this when researching my Ercona - the DDR similar version of the Ikonta

Last edited by Ole; 12-12-2007 at 05:14 PM. Reason: Made link clickable
Mike Wilde is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 12-12-2007, 05:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
glbeas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Roswell, Ga. USA
Posts: 2,877
Default

Thanks for the info, quite interesting.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac View Post
Glbeas , can you post few pictures with your camera.

William Henry Jackson and Ansel Adams both used zeiss tessar at 35 mm.

I want to own the camera but money is in the sky with cubic zirconium ..
I've yet to get a good neg from it as a previous repair job had the focusing element in the wrong groove of the helicals and was misfocussing. I checked it with a ground glass when I reassembled to make sure it was right this time around. Next chore is to get my scanner functioning again so I can post images, something squirrely in XP has it shut down.
__________________
Gary Beasley
glbeas is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using