Is it OK to throw out photo-antiquities?

[werra]

You sound just like my wife... she's not content after a clearout unless everything is totally DESTROYED

Well, I hope you are not accusing me in teaching her such a manners :rolleyes:

[benjiboy]

Being a bit of a photo antiquity myself after more than fifty years photography, I don't relish the idea of spending the rest of my existence on a landfill.

[Christopher Walrath]

I have an old Graflok roll film adapter for 4x5 that is, like, 1,500 years old. I know I will never that capacity to use it. I have had ot for a year and I don't see it leaving anytime soon. Yeah, it's OK to toss unneededs. Good luck trying to carry through with it.

[fotch]

Your junk may be someones treasure. Pass it forward.

[colrehogan]

I find that I feel the need to rescue things from the dumpster. Hence, the 8x10 Century No. 7 studio camera on it's stand in my living room. The lights that came with it are in a different room. One of the lights plugs into a lens board and is usable with the camera, though I haven't figured out how to use it properly.

I also have some old Kodak ads, one of which is for IR film during WWII (I think).

[Sirius Glass]

The answer is NO!

Steve

[JimO]

packrats of the world unite - don't throw them out...

p.s. you can always find another wife, this is one-of-a-kind!!!!

[Sirius Glass]

packrats of the world unite - don't throw them out...

p.s. you can always find another wife, this is one-of-a-kind!!!!

Amen, amen, AMEN, AMEN, AMEN!

The next wife will be a new model with lower mileage!

steve

[werra]

The next wife will be a new model with lower mileage!

Right, more plastic, airbags and more expensive service bills

[Sirius Glass]

Right, more plastic, airbags and more expensive service bills

No, better sprung suspension. Fewer dings. Well lubricated.

Steve