Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,915   Posts: 1,194,118   Online: 761
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    donbga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Early Riser
    The digital neg is strictly for contact printing or can it be used for enlargement? Like make it an 8x10 neg and enlarge to a 20x24 print? Can I use this method instead of LVT negs?
    Contact printing only.
    Don Bryant

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    197
    Some after thoughts I had when reviewing the print...

    While the FB print appears lighter then the digital picture, I know this is because the Dmax of the paper is not able to reach that of the digital file. When I scanned the print no adjustments (no black point set) were made. Also, while the digital file looks far sharper (it was sharpened a bit to preserve details), the compressed version posted looks far sharper then the original file because of compression I think.

    When I went back and set the black point in the scanned FB print, it looked very similar to the original file.

    Does anyone else have any general helpful hints or tips so I might improve?

    Has anyone tried gray scale inks such as MIS to produce digital negatives, if so, how did it work out for you?

    Thanks,
    Martin

  3. #13
    donbga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by menglert
    Some after thoughts I had when reviewing the print...

    While the FB print appears lighter then the digital picture, I know this is because the Dmax of the paper is not able to reach that of the digital file. When I scanned the print no adjustments (no black point set) were made. Also, while the digital file looks far sharper (it was sharpened a bit to preserve details), the compressed version posted looks far sharper then the original file because of compression I think.

    When I went back and set the black point in the scanned FB print, it looked very similar to the original file.

    Does anyone else have any general helpful hints or tips so I might improve?

    Has anyone tried gray scale inks such as MIS to produce digital negatives, if so, how did it work out for you?

    Thanks,
    Martin
    MIS gray scale inks are not a good choice for several reasons. They do not dry properly on Pictorico or other transparent materials. Grey scale inks cause distortions of the tonal scale, and don't always block UV light particularly well. Or to put it another way it is difficult to get enough ink density to make decent negatives.

    I would stronly suggest that you look at several sources of information about making digital negatives.

    1) Purchase Dan Burkholder's book.
    http://www.danburkholder.com/

    2) Purchase Mark Nelson's ebook.
    http://www.precisiondigitalnegatives.com/

    3) Look at Clay Harmon's Color Ratio article covering the production of inkjet negatives.
    http://www.alternativephotography.co...es/art056.html

    4) Huntington Witherill's black & white calibration system of digital output.
    http://www.huntingtonwitherill.com/

    IMO, Brad Hinkel and Jim Read's digital method really don't produce great results.

    Hope this helps,
    Don Bryant

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin