Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,753   Posts: 1,483,924   Online: 1166
      
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910
Results 91 to 98 of 98
  1. #91

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,957
    Quote Originally Posted by hadeer View Post
    Btw I would be very curious how they would prevent people taking photographs with cellphones.
    Whether you have a camera or not, they will just grab you, and you'll be locked up somewhere for a long time. That's all.

  2. #92
    bjorke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    SF & Surrounding Planet
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,032
    Images
    20
    There is a technology available that allows locations to broadcast commands to celphones in the area, so that the camera is simply inoperable when the phone is within the specified zone.

    This was made public around Deember or so, and the baddest news is that this technology had already been installed in millions of the phones, already in service, before the announcement came.

    This is similar to the discovery last year by the EFF that color photocopiers save subtle but FBI-traceable serial number info in the dither pattern of the yellow dots. This bit of steganography had been going on for years without the public's knowledge. Law enforcement can look at a color photocopy and go directly to the manufacturer and the service records of the machine to discover information about who made that copy.

    Quite a lot of this stuff goes on. If you're of a forging mind, try scanning a dollar bill in Photoshop some time -- find out what happens. Your attempt will be detected and halted (the US Treasury website can provide you with legally-safe images of currency to use instead).

    Feeling safe and happy about all that pr0n you've got stashed on external drive J: now?

    What's uncertain is whether these anti-phone fields will be mobile -- say, attached to Jessica Simpson's car -- or whether such un-announced fields will be generally legal -- would your rights be infringed if, while having a romantic anniversary dinner with your mistress, you were unable to make a celphone snap of her simply because Justin Timberlake was lurking in some corner of the same restaurant?

    "What Would Zeus Do?"
    KBPhotoRantPhotoPermitAPUG flickr Robot

  3. #93
    Rob Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    King's Lynn, Norfolk, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    509
    Images
    99
    Does anyone, anywhere have any solid official information about any proposed legislation? I've searched everywhere on the web, contacted my MP and another MP in who is close to the cabinet. It appears that this paranoia is a throwback to an article in one of the red-tops a few years ago(The Daily Express, I think) reporting that the government was to follow France in restricting photography in public places. It was denied then as being unnecessary and unworkable. (I understand the ban in France may be abandoned as unenforcable - anybody got any info on that?)

    Most of the problems reported are due to overzealous jobsworths and genuinely concerned parents. To my mind anyone who deliberately photographs children without their parents consent is asking for trouble. Jobsworths can usually be dealt with by asking for their ID, their manager's phone number and suggesting calling the police to sort it out.

    I used to be paranoid but 'they' told me I wasn't anymore!

    Rob

  4. #94
    Andy K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sunny Southend, England.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,422
    Images
    81
    I think any ban on photography in 'sensitive' areas, anywhere in the world, is pointless.

    Have these people not heard of Google Earth?


    -----------My Flickr-----------
    Anáil nathrach, ortha bháis is beatha, do chéal déanaimh.

  5. #95

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6
    Here is a video in today's Guardian about a street photographer taking pictures during the Christmas holiday season. It's a little over ten minutes long.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2...t-photographer

  6. #96
    w9cae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    253
    Watching that video gave me chills.

  7. #97

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,550
    Thanks Jay for posting that video. I can't believe that really happen. I hope that doesn't spread.

    Jeff

  8. #98

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    54
    Unless something like this is put in the news paper or television very few people know or care .And if its put on the news reel will the head line read photographer jailed
    on suspicious behavior or Police harass innocent photographer?

    Mike

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin