|
|
|
-
Nice shot, and congrats on getting it picked up in the ad industry blog, but I thought 1956 was the address, not the year it was built. Is it?
-
Thanks everyone. David, you are correct, 1956 is the address.
D.
-
 Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb
Nice shot, and congrats on getting it picked up in the ad industry blog, but I thought 1956 was the address, not the year it was built. Is it?
The blogger who used this image wrote:
This image has a great duality. Obviously shot on film this image evokes a feeling of being back in time complimented by the address alluding to the year this may have been taken.
Film, B&W and 1956 matched as an association of ideas, just the architectural style didn't fit, that's all.
Hence my (admittedly superfluous) comment.
|
|
Adv Reply
