Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,266   Posts: 1,534,331   Online: 786
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    EKDobbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124

    Double image in rangefinder?

    I decided to try my hand at a little CLA of a Kodak Signet 35 rangefinder camera. Oiled some of the gears, filed a mechanism that wasn't catching, etc. I also took the liberty of scrubbing every surface (minus the mirror) of the rangefinder apparatus. You can now see much more clearly than before, and the triangular patch is now visible. However, the patch is projecting a double image slightly below where it should.

    Any ideas? I managed to bend the focus glass (?) a little to get it almost correct vertically, but it's still seeing double.

    Any ideas are appreciated.

    If you want me to take a picture of anything in particular I can.
    In other worlds he has
    darker days, blacker swells.
    Strokes that mix noir revenge
    on waves of grey.

  2. #2
    EKDobbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124
    Quick update, silly me found the vertical alignment screw. Still seeing double, but progress!
    In other worlds he has
    darker days, blacker swells.
    Strokes that mix noir revenge
    on waves of grey.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    43
    I don't know the camera, but most rangefinders have a front-silvered mirror behind the RF window. Has someone replaced it with a back-silvered mirror? You could be getting a second reflection from the glass.

  4. #4
    EKDobbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124
    I'm not home at the moment, but that's quite possible. The camera was serviced at least once by a Kodak technician in the early 60's (they leave fancy little stickers in the film chamber). It's possible that they replaced the mirror during a routine CLA. The mirror was the only glass that didn't have a yellow sheen from the weird glue they used.

    That's actually the whole reason I opened it up. Viewfinder was practically impossible to see through, and rangefinder patch was neigh invisible unless pointed at the sun. My theory is that the weird (orange/yellow, organic looking) glue they used off-gassed in the viewfinder assembly and coated all the glass. A few quick wipes and it's about 40 years newer, minus the double image and a slightly maladjusted rangefinder.

    Now if only I had the skillz necessary to oil the shutter gears and clean the aperture blades...

    I can already tell this hobby is going down the rabbit hole. ;D
    In other worlds he has
    darker days, blacker swells.
    Strokes that mix noir revenge
    on waves of grey.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    43
    If it does turn out to be a back-silvered mirror, and you feel like replacing it with a front-silvered one, look out for a cheap plastic Polaroid, of the type that has the film-pack underneath. They cost next to nothing and have a mirror big enough to make several rangefinder mirrors. Use the glass-cutter on the glass side, not the silvered side.

    If you haven't already seen it, there's some information on the camera on Daniel Mitchell's site.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin