Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,300   Posts: 1,536,049   Online: 963
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    David Lyga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,236
    LiamG: you have provided the BEST answer so far. At least with a 28-80mm you would get the normal 50. Surprisingly, von Hoegh, the modern zooms are VERY sharp; (but slow, true). Still, it is a bit of an answer. I would really like to put a Minolta MC on a Nikon, though. I could slightly increase its infinity to match the 46.5mm distance needed. - David Lyga

  2. #22
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,628
    Quote Originally Posted by David Lyga View Post

    To those of you who say or infer that ALL normal lenses are in the $30 range today, I say NO!!! Normal Minolta MD or MC lenses as well as M42 and Konica and Yashica bayonet ones can be had for about 1/4 the price of a normal pre-AI Nikon lens. Canon normals and Pentax K normals can be had for about 1/2 the Nikon ones or less. Sorry, that is what I experience in the Philadelphia region.
    Fine, but that does not make the Nikon lens price "outrageous". It just shows that they are worth more in the marketplace, therefore there is greater demand for them. Nikon is one of the current Big Two manufacturers, with a mount that will take old Nikkor glass. That is why there is more demand for them than for lenses in Canon FL/FD, Contax/Yashica, Minolta MD/MC, Konica, M42, etc, all of which are obsolete mounts requiring adapters to use on digital cameras. Pentax is less popular currently than the Big Two, with a large amount of K-mount normal lenses out there, so it follows that demand is lower, affecting prices.

    Why don't I simply avoid the Nikon bodies? Because the temptation is too strong with prices so low.
    So, you want no other make of camera, even though you can find many of them for the same cost.

    You see, I want to have my cake and EAT it too: dirty rotten spoiled, I am.
    Ok, so rationality isn't a strong consideration here.

    And, somehow, someway, I WILL GET a bunch of normal Nikons and not spend much. Few know how persistent I can be in my enduring quest for frugality.
    I expect you will, and good luck with it- I hope you find them soon. It is the best solution given what you want to accomplish. If you enjoy your quest for frugality, that's what counts most.
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    115
    Some examples of the 43-86 f3.5 are really cheap as well, on the other hand it has been called Nikon's worst lens.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,381
    Quote Originally Posted by David Lyga View Post
    LiamG: you have provided the BEST answer so far. At least with a 28-80mm you would get the normal 50. Surprisingly, von Hoegh, the modern zooms are VERY sharp; (but slow, true). Still, it is a bit of an answer. I would really like to put a Minolta MC on a Nikon, though. I could slightly increase its infinity to match the 46.5mm distance needed. - David Lyga
    Their sharpness may be comparable to some primes, but they are slower, bulkier, heavier, more expensive. To me they are a compromise at best. I don't like them and don't use them. YMMV.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,381
    Quote Originally Posted by LiamG View Post
    Some examples of the 43-86 f3.5 are really cheap as well, on the other hand it has been called Nikon's worst lens.
    They're cheap for a reason. If I had one I'd give it away.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,456
    A lot of time and energy to save $10
    - Bill Lynch

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin