Sagittal Tangential Petzval Terms
I want to clarify these terms in my mind. Erwin Putts tells that an image is a combination of these three. I saw at MTF tests , first two but not the third one. Do all aberrations spread in to these three or does it spread on more on one or two ? How do them to form a combination for better plasticity ?
Is there any computer simulation examples for each image characteristics to understand them better ?
Is there any way to effect each one to create a different combination ? Is there a way to separate each one ?
"Sagittal" and "Tangential" are terms relating to astigmatism . http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/re...errations3.htm
"Petzval" is a type of portrait lens, http://www.antiquecameras.net/petzvallens.html or the Petzval sum, http://books.google.com/books?id=kS9...%20sum&f=false
Mustafa, do you ever try to look things up yourself?
Last edited by E. von Hoegh; 06-22-2013 at 12:12 PM. Click to view previous post history.
I found the same at wikipedia. Does it mean MTF tests only explain the amount of astigmatism ?
No. MTF = Modulation Transfer Function. Think of it as a combination of resolution and contrast, since all aberrations effect both. http://spie.org/x34298.xml
Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac
If I could google this, so can you.
But MTF tests have two curves , tangential and sagittal and we found that two relates to astigmatism. But your latest post and I have read in books says MTF shows the combination of all aberrations.
Whats going on ? I could not get it. Is it telling the aberrations in astigmatism ? By the way , I found a reference about the authors who got their prescriptions from ELCAN archive and conduct tests on Summilux , f:1 one and Summicron 50 f:2. They analysed mandler designs and the double gauss ones.
All they found , there is virtually no aberration record at summicron , but for others all aberrations are so low but one single abnerration is 10 times more. I never heard that one in any book.
IMHO , If they would put under MTF test , they would be worse than Zeiss or Nikon. But it does not say the all story.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Two of the Seidel aberrations are closely related, namely field curvature and astigmatism.
Field curvature is where the best focus of the image lies not on a plane but on a curved surface.
Astigmatism is where the tangential rays and sagittal rays do not focus at the same point. The tangential rays focus on a curved surface and the sagittal rays focus on a different curved surface.
There is an equation that provides a relationship between the radii of these three surfaces. I don't recall what the formula is, but it can be found on line. However, as I recall, one consequence of the formula is that it is impossible to correct for astigmatism unless one also corrects for field curvature.
There is also a theorem that relates field curvature to the refractive indexes and curvatures of the lens surfaces.
One other thing. Astigmatism contributes to the MTF curves, as do the other aberrations. As a result, the MTF curves in two directions are not equivalent, so one needs to MTF curves.
Can We say or not ,the balance between sagittal and tangential curves responsible for plasticity ?