Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 73,601   Posts: 1,622,397   Online: 766
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    It sounds to me like you've got me doing the job with the lenses upright, rather than horizontal. You must be knowing the back lens is convex and it therefore won't lay flat.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    I wonder if a dumb idea wouldn't be something as simple as a radiator hose clamp.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,848
    Not neccesarily. I'd use a surface plate for this because I have a small one. I'd place the cemented pair flat on the plate, if both surfaces were convex I'd make a ring and lap it flat/parralel. Use the V-blocks against the edges to keep everything centered, and give the balsam a few weeks at least to set. Personally I'm hesitant to use UV curing cement, it's much more difficult to decement the lenses.
    I recemented a R-R on an old Kodak folding camera using balsam from local trees. The camera was my mother's father's, I now have pictures of her taken with that same camera over a span of almost 80 years.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,848
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom1956 View Post
    I wonder if a dumb idea wouldn't be something as simple as a radiator hose clamp.
    Now I know you're joking. Right? You're joking, right?

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    I've already ordered the Canadian Balsam. If I foul up the job, I'll boil it and start over.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060

    Revision of Thread and question

    Upon disassembling this Rolleiflex 3.5E with Xenotar, I find the front element is a single piece of glass, not a cemented doublet. And it appears that it could possibly be etched on the front surface, or perhaps fractured coating makes it appear that way. I cannot tell because I do not have adequate magnification to see that closely. Obviously this piece of glass needs to get in the hands of an expert. It may turn out to be irreparable. This seems a dismal end to an otherwise good camera, so I float the matter out there for input. Thank you.

  7. #17
    Jon Goodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    656
    You could use the article I wrote: http://www.fotomozaic.ro/
    Your tongue is probably sensitive enough that you won't need to worry about clamps or jigs. At least mine has always worked just fine for work like this. Students of dentistry learn early just how tiny of a difference in height the tongue can detect. I offered to send Canada Balsam to anyone who needed it in another thread weeks ago. When that is gone I also have some very high grade rosin (some from Honduras, some from China, and more from other places). It will work just like Canada Balsam, actually.
    If the element is etched on the front surface, you will have a much more expensive and complex repair. Good luck, however.
    Jon

  8. #18

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060

    Quote Received--$225.

    So I've received the quote from Focal Point on the polishing and re-coating of the front element only of the Rolleiflex Xenotar 3.5 lens element. I have the element extracted from the camera already. All it is is a single little thin piece of glass. And it's $225.00? Really? C'mon. Surely there's an alternative. $225? I wonder what other ideas there might be on this.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,848
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom1956 View Post
    So I've received the quote from Focal Point on the polishing and re-coating of the front element only of the Rolleiflex Xenotar 3.5 lens element. I have the element extracted from the camera already. All it is is a single little thin piece of glass. And it's $225.00? Really? C'mon. Surely there's an alternative. $225? I wonder what other ideas there might be on this.
    Do you have any clue what that entails? You can always do it yourself...

  10. #20

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    Yes I know what it entails. It also entails putting the lens back in the camera and sticking the camera back in the junk collection, and using $225 towards the bills, which keep coming. Or finding a more reasonable alternative. I'm somebody that $225 doesn't come easy on. Thanks.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin