Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,202   Posts: 1,531,547   Online: 1099
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Loose Gravel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    921
    Images
    14

    Homemade underwater camera housing

    I've been working a project for myself and need to finish with some underwater photography -- in a pool. I've been thinking of a Nikonos, but most of the other pix in the project are LF and medium. I'd like to do these with a MF.

    Anybody here made an underwater housing? Looking on the web, it doesn't look that bad except maybe winding the film. I'd like to use a Mamiya 7 with a 43mm, so focus is probably no a big issue. Seems as though most use a piece of pipe, but I was thinking about an ammo box with the side opened up.

    Any thoughts would be great as always. --LG--
    Watch for Loose Gravel

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    140
    how about a periscope instead. Just an L=shaped tube with a mirror. That way you wouldn't have to risk putting your camera in a possibly leaky box.

  3. #3
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,587
    Images
    122
    Another option would be to make your housing with an air inlet and use a small pump to apply positive pressure to the inside so air can escape through any gaps rather than allowing water in.

    At fairly shallow depths, you would not need a lot of pressure.

    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Windsor, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    146
    Have to say, I think you're fairly mad. No offence and all. If you go down the biscuit tin route, I give you evens that you'll trash a very nice piece of kit.

    You can get specifically designed 'bags' made from heavy duty plastic with a proper fastening device. You can only go to about 10 meters before the bag starts squeezing the shutter, but that should be fine for you. These sorts of things: http://www.camerasunderwater.co.uk/e...act/index.html

    Geoff

  5. #5
    MattCarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,303
    Images
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Loose Gravel View Post
    I've been working a project for myself and need to finish with some underwater photography -- in a pool. I've been thinking of a Nikonos, but most of the other pix in the project are LF and medium. I'd like to do these with a MF.

    Anybody here made an underwater housing? Looking on the web, it doesn't look that bad except maybe winding the film. I'd like to use a Mamiya 7 with a 43mm, so focus is probably no a big issue. Seems as though most use a piece of pipe, but I was thinking about an ammo box with the side opened up.

    Any thoughts would be great as always. --LG--

    1) There was a housing made for a MF TLR. I seem to recall it was Rollei and expensive. There is a picture of Gowland using this.

    2) Keep in mind that with a flat view port will change the effective focal length of your lens. Your 43mm will be more like a 65mm.

    3) the idea of a positive pressure housing seems very risky to me. A little burp and your camera is flooded.

    I would contact either Backscatter in Monterey or Subaquatic Photo in Salinas. Dan Blodget at Subaquatic would be a great resource on whether this has been done or how you could do it.

    Matt
    Matt

  6. #6
    darinwc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,043
    Images
    157
    As above, I would not be willing to risk an expensive camera in a UW camera housing at all, unless i was specifically insured for it. You could try it with a holga or something... but I think the reality is that UW is a place best left for digital.. you dont have to wind or change film.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by Loose Gravel View Post
    I've been working a project for myself and need to finish with some underwater photography -- in a pool. I've been thinking of a Nikonos, but most of the other pix in the project are LF and medium. I'd like to do these with a MF.

    Anybody here made an underwater housing? Looking on the web, it doesn't look that bad except maybe winding the film. I'd like to use a Mamiya 7 with a 43mm, so focus is probably no a big issue. Seems as though most use a piece of pipe, but I was thinking about an ammo box with the side opened up.

    Any thoughts would be great as always. --LG--
    A friend of mine did this, for several cameras (i.e. several housings). He was a Chief Scientist at Kodak. Kodak paid for a lot of it -- which was just as well. It is far more difficult than it looks, especially with wide-angles. Ammo boxes may work for a metre or less, but even then, I'd be nervous.

    Incidentally I've handled the Rolleimarin (for TLRs), in Bermuda 40 years ago. A friend of a friend had two (!). It was HUGE, and out of the water, very ungainly too.

    Cheers,

    R.

  8. #8
    MattCarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,303
    Images
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by darinwc View Post
    As above, I would not be willing to risk an expensive camera in a UW camera housing at all, unless i was specifically insured for it. You could try it with a holga or something... but I think the reality is that UW is a place best left for digital.. you dont have to wind or change film.
    Good point--on a trip to Chuuk my brother and I both flooded our Nikonos cameras. Ouch (turned out to be a problem with the O-ring lube).

    Luckily, we both had camera flood insurance. Yep, they sell it.

    Now, one thing to consider is the possibility of multiple Nik V's. They are cheap enough--ebay has them for $200-300 with 35mm lens. A CLA and you are on the way. Maybe even skip the CLA. Shoot a roll each dive and swap lenses rather than reload film.

    Geez--20mm lenses are about $200.

    So, lets say you had 3 Nik V's, with 3 20mm lenses. You could do this for <$1k. I'd probably use one strobe setup--just to reduce bulk--and you are on your way for way cheaper than a digital. Way cheaper.

    Or, have a macro and a WA setup. By the time you pay for a dSLR and housing, you could have a stable of Nikonos cameras!

    I would have multiple strobe cables, though. Make sure that each camera has a cable setup before you get on the boat. Disconnect the cable from the strobe, reconnect to the fresh camera. Wrap the used camera in a wet rag to keep salt crystals from forming...Makes me want to get back out there!



    Matt

  9. #9
    MattCarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,303
    Images
    31
    Here is a useful description of UW MF

    http://subaquaticcamera.com/medium.html

    Matt



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin