Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,518   Posts: 1,543,758   Online: 857
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,837
    Images
    108

    What are zernike polynomials and their use

    Hello ,

    I found several web pages about zernike polynomials . What are they and what are their use ? I researched to change aberrations of a photograph and simulate lens on photographs. I couldnt understand many things described.
    Do this math way help me to rerender a photograph ?
    This is not analog but lens design is depends on computers.

    Best ,

    Mustafa Umut Sarac

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lafayette, La.
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    98
    Images
    8
    I'm not sure, but I bet they're good fried in batter with lots of cayenne pepper.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,396
    Mustafa, have you considered going back to school? The usual cure for not knowing the math involved in something is to learn it, and courses often help.

  4. #4
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    I googled, and found http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ZernikePolynomial.html

    that didn't help me at all, though...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #5
    Nicholas Lindan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,375
    Images
    4
    Taking liberties and cutting corners:

    Zernike polynomials are a set of mathematical functions that when added up give the solution to the form of the wavefront from a lens.

    Functions of this sort, the best known being Fourier and Laplace, allow transforming an arbitrarily complex formula into a set of simpler formulas. Very simplistically: the fourier formulas for a sound are what are shown in the bouncing-bar equalizer display of an MP3 player. Finding how something (say a loudspeaker) will respond to a complex signal (say a snare drum) is very hard to calculate. But how a loudspeaker will respond to a pure tone is easy to calculate. So if one takes the the sound of a snare-drum and finds the set of pure tones that make up its sound then the response of the speaker to a snare drum will be the same as the adding together the loudspeaker's response to each of the pure tones. It is a lot easier to calculate the response of a thousand types of loudspeaker than build and measure a thousand types.

    Ditto with lenses. A lens, after all, just applies a mathematical formula to the path of a ray of light.

    The MTF response of a lens is the fourier transform of a lens' performance: the MTF graph is like the lens' equalizer graph.

    There are many 'transforms', and some transforms are better at representing
    some physical processes than others. Zernike functions are good at representing the effect of lenses on light.

    The functions are called 'orthogonal' because they don't interact. Like measuring a box in the three orthogonal axis of geometry class: changing the the height does nothing to the depth or width.

    The orthogonality is what lets one take the response to the simpler signals and add them up at the end to find the response to a complex signal. What the lens does to one Zernike polynomial has nothing to do with what it does to any other Zernike polynomial.

    In sum -- the whole thing is a mathematical 'trick' to make calculations easier, similar to the 'casting out nines' trick of accountants.
    DARKROOM AUTOMATION
    f-Stop Timers - Enlarging Meters
    http://www.darkroomautomation.com/da-main.htm

  6. #6
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,837
    Images
    108
    I liked orthogonal concept. I read somewhere lens design is difficult because every single change on a aberration calculation effects the others.
    i think zernike concept is useful because of that.
    zernike got 1953 nobel if i m not wrong , 54 years and we dont know nearly anything about it.

  7. #7
    tim_walls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Croydon & Leeds
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,037
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac View Post
    zernike got 1953 nobel if i m not wrong , 54 years and we dont know nearly anything about it.
    As a general rule, I think it is dangerous to extrapolate the state of all human knowledge from one's own ignorance.
    Another day goes under; a little bourbon will take the strain...

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Stavanger or Trondheim, Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    771
    Images
    24
    I suggest that you read Born & Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light. Cambridge University Press. It is the classical work on optics. Chapter 9 is about the diffraction theory of aberrations and discusses Zernike polynomials.

    http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Opt.../dp/0521639212



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin