Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,925   Posts: 1,194,455   Online: 525
      
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Istanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,861
    Images
    91

    Faster film sliding than rotating slit panorama camera

    I am thinking a panorama camera with a rotating slit on a circular carrier and a film sliding faster than the rotating and scanning slit. I think this camera will produce huge blur but I believe reversing the blur to original positive will give me more than the single slit could give me.

    Digitally and mechanically correcting the image on a other film or other file will give me more learning curve.

    As analog suggests , bigger the recording medium , better the result. And this technology is used to create better recording with reel to reel tapes .

    What I can not think , is welcome with your messages.

    Best ,

    Umut

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    344
    If I understand correctly, you are talking about stretching the image over a longer piece of film (mechanically, rather than optically), then compressing it back to original size.

    I'd love to see if that can be done mechanically (the recompression). I've certainly seen the stretching effect when you use you wrong gear. I learned early on in my career as a Cirkut photographer to always use the next larger gear choice if the picture falls in between sizes. That way people get ever so slightly thinner, rather than fatter.

    Your idea is an interesting exercise, but if your goal is to put the information on a larger piece of film, then why not just use a larger camera? The #10 Cirkut Camera I use gives a 10 inch x 60 inch (or longer) negative. They were sold in sizes from 5" to 16".

    I just recently sold my 120 Noblex and it was capable of very sharp 8x enlargements. Roundshots can give even larger negatives, but usually require an 8x10 (or slit scan, like I think you are suggesting) enlarger.

    I do remember roughing out ideas with a fellow Cirkut shooter for a slit scan enlarger (there are commercial ones around, but not many). I seemed realistic at the time, but I suspect might end up being troublesome to get the kinks worked out.

  3. #3
    vpwphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    775
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    2
    Have fun... just don't see this as commercially viable. I do understand your concept.
    THe spool-up speed would be a problem.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin