|
|
|
-
 Originally Posted by ic-racer
I always figured once you put Horseman rollfilm back (with a winding lever on it  ) and a lens with some coverage to use the movements, there would not be much "Hasselblad" to it anymore 
I'm not getting your point?
-
 Originally Posted by ic-racer
I always figured once you put Horseman rollfilm back (with a winding lever on it  ) and a lens with some coverage to use the movements, there would not be much "Hasselblad" to it anymore 
Why bother? I have better things to think about.
Steve
Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!
Nothing beats a great piece of glass!
I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.
-
 Originally Posted by brucemuir
I'm not getting your point?
Actually now I see the wind crank. For a while there I thought they had marketed that for the digital crowd. Now I see it is a film camera.
Here are some color pictures of the 'Flexbody' and a list of the movements available with various lenses:
http://harrysproshop.com/Hasselblad_...blad_flex.html
Last edited by ic-racer; 05-12-2011 at 09:39 PM.
-
Well the "Flexbody" allows use of the Zeiss glass for hasselblad & filmbacks that some already own. Although movements are indeed limited.
I believe it used a smaller image area by way of a mask but you could remove the mask it desired to get full 6x6. (I'm not 100% sure of specifics on this so please no one flame me on this, I got enough of that on the Cindy Sherman thread)
Okay I'm kindding about the flame remark. When someone that knows specifics please set me straight.
Now the "ARCbody" indeed uses a Rodenstock lens that affords a lot more movements.
I would image the Flexbody would still be awesome for portraiture but maybe not architecture.
-
Looks like a very nice project.
Just ni case you need ideas, here's a link to a less ambitious project, built by a member of the French LF forum :
http://www.galerie-photo.com/constru...ambre-6x6.html
Laurent
---------------------------------------------------------------
Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast (Oscar Wilde)
My APUG Blog
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
Maybe I'm off base on this, certainly wouldn't be the first time, but wouldn't there be patents on this design? I would think Hasselblad would still protect their ownership even though they are no longer making these.
Neat cameras anyway. I think Keith Carter used one.
-
In terms of reverse engineering, this simpler, supposed "prototype" may be easier to make: http://cgi.ebay.com/Prototype-Rare-H...#ht_7229wt_907
-
If I were going to do a project like this on a budget I'd just make a hassy lensmount adapter from an old body and put it on a baby Speed Graphic.
For a more involved project I'd look for a 6x9 monorail and do both a lensmount adapter and hassy film holder adapter for the back from a beat up body. Here is a neat Cambo 6x9 monorail (but the price is way off). http://cgi.ebay.com/Super-Cambo-6x9-...ht_2184wt_1282
-
The whole idea I think...
was for it to be compact.
A baby speed would probably meet that criteria but that Cambo, maybe not so much.
-
 Originally Posted by brucemuir
The whole idea I think...
was for it to be compact.
A baby speed would probably meet that criteria but that Cambo, maybe not so much.
Yes, since the Hassy lenses are either 80mm or retrofocus or telephoto, that 'baby' twelve-inch rail is on the big side. But it could be cut in half .
|
|