Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,926   Posts: 1,556,805   Online: 951
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Toffle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Point Pelee, ON, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,800
    Images
    122

    Mounting a BIG Packard

    Here's the problem:


    1. I have a number of shutterless lenses that I'd love to try, and I'd love to move beyond the "black hat" shutter.
    2. I have a Packard shutter that would solve this problem.
    3. The next problem is that the outside dimensions of the Packard (6-1/2") is larger than the inside of my bellows attachment. (6")

    What I need:
    I need to construct a housing for my Packard shutter that will attach to the front standard (wooden) of my 8x10 Burke and James and will accept Technika and/or Calumet lensboards. (The B&J takes Technika boards, but I have a few lenses on Calumet boards which are just a tad larger.)

    The final piece of this puzzle is that I have limited tools and marginal woodworking experience. I am not afraid of wasting a few pieces of wood, but I think I need a little guidance to get me past the starting line.

    There may be further questions along the way.

    Cheers
    Tom, on Point Pelee, Canada

    Ansel Adams had the Zone System... I'm working on the points system. First I points it here, and then I points it there...

    http://tom-overton-images.weebly.com


  2. #2
    vpwphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,109
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    7
    Your main consideration is do you need infinity focus? And do you use front tilts/swings etc. Setting the lens out front of the axis makes movements very troublesome to comprehend and manage.

    Sad reality is to buy a camera that does/accomodates what you want/need without undue comprimise.
    You could just mount the packard out front 'hat style" This might be the best solution, and you could use the camera in the meantime while you mess about with other rear mount options.
    Have a great day.... cheers.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Ont, Canada
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,046
    You may just want to get a smaller Packard and fit it inside the bellows, in the traditional way.
    Other wise you need
    a B and J lens board with a hole larger than your largest back end of lens
    a smaller piece of quarter inch spacer that will fit within the B&J retaining clips,
    A 7 inch spacer that will fit the back of your packard. These three get screwed together.
    a second spacer to fit the front of the packard with hole for pin, tube and wires as necessary.
    Fit the necessary clips to the front of this for your largest lens board and have a 2nd reducer to fit that for the second lens board. Close the sides of the spacer "box" around the Packard.
    Or get an Ilexpo shutter and fit as above.
    Really the cleanest neatest and lightest solution is a packard inside your camera
    "There are a great many things I am in doubt about at the moment, and I should consider myself favoured if you would kindly enlighten me. Signed, Doubtful, off to Canada." (BJP 1914).

    Regards
    Bill

  4. #4
    jp498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owls Head ME
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,467
    Images
    74
    I'd suggest either putting it on the front of the lens, or selling it and getting one that will fit on the back of a lensboard.

  5. #5
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,867
    Blog Entries
    1
    Make a collar and put it in front of the lens.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]

  6. #6
    Toffle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Point Pelee, ON, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,800
    Images
    122
    Thanks for the replies. I agree that any adaptation of a camera involves compromises. (that seems to be the implicit message in most responses so far) The one consideration I need to keep in mind is that my solution is intended to satisfy a number of lenses with different diameters, so mounting on the front of the lenses might require more engineering than rear-mounting. Also, some of my lenses are process lenses, which rotate to select apertures. Again, this makes front-mounting of the Packard awkward.

    I had not taken into account that extending the lensboard design would complicate movements on the camera, and I definitely would prefer to use most of these lenses at infinity if possible. The upside of this is that the Packard (a #8, if I am correct... it has two pistons) only cost me $15 so if I can't use it at this point, it is no great loss.

    Still looking for ideas... I do have a rudimental design on paper. I'm just not sure I have the woodworking skills to make it happen.

    Cheers
    Tom, on Point Pelee, Canada

    Ansel Adams had the Zone System... I'm working on the points system. First I points it here, and then I points it there...

    http://tom-overton-images.weebly.com


  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    337
    Images
    29
    I've built a few "shutter boxes" before and they work pretty well. It is essentially a box about 8" square and about an inch deep. The shutter is mounted inside the box. The box has a panel on the back that is essentially a lens board that goes on the front of the camera and the front of the box has a recess to accept your standard lens boards. It will accommodate lenses that you mount on your standard lens boards. The overall depth of the box needs to be about 2" deep in order to accommodate the rear panel that fits into the camera front. You can buy the wood to build one at your local craft store and don't need anything more than 3/8" thick.

    Couple of issues: First is that the box will not accommodate lenses that project any more than about a half inch through the lens board because they would hit the shutter if they did. Second is that there are a little design issues you need to figure out regarding how to activate the shutter (shutter release and adjustment pin) but they aren't really that difficult to work out. Last is that with the shutter box exending out in front of the camera, the weight of the lens is out farther than normal and heavy lenses will present a problem.

    To build a shutter box, you really do need to have a certain amount of wood working tools like a drill and preferably a small table saw. Doing it without the table could be a real challenge.

    I really do most of my exposures wtih my old shutterless lenses with the "Uncover the lens with the lens cap and then cover it back up" approach and can easily handle shutter speeds of 1/4 of a second that way. You can also do the Jim Galli dark slide approach and get faster speeds up to about 1/20 of a second (which is about what a packard is anyway). If your wide open aperature settings are requiring fast shutter speeds that make hand exposure difficult, you might consider either slower speed film or neutral density filters. If you are set on being able to use your lenses at infinity and also require shorter shutter speeds, this will present a problem.

    Hope this all helps.

    Dan
    Dan's website: www.dandozer.com

  8. #8
    richard ide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Markham, Ontario
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,216
    I made an accessory for my Cambo which does the job beautifully. I built a box to hold the shutter with a lensboard (home made) which stands off about 1/4" in front. The rear of the box has a recess that accepts a lens board. I made the box long enough to accept filters mounted into plywood panels as well. I can use large diameter glass filters (from aerial camera) and both 3" and 4" gelatin filters in the metal frames. The rubber tube goes through a hole in the bottom. I can mount it on the front standard both in front or behind and to the front panel of the bellows. Works fine with lenses from 200mm to 760mm.
    Richard

    Why are there no speaker jacks on a stereo camera?

  9. #9
    bliorg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NW Philly, PA, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    549
    Images
    262

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    167
    Images
    17
    I built a box that attaches in lieu of the lens board. The big packard is inside the black box and the bigger lens board has plenty of room for a big lens flange. Here are a couple pictures of it mounted to my Improved Seneca 8x10.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Packard 2.jpg   Packard 1.jpg  

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin