Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,880   Posts: 1,520,478   Online: 902
      
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 48 of 48
  1. #41
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    6,996
    Images
    222

    Kodak's totally new film in years.

    Quote Originally Posted by Yashinoff View Post
    Verichrome pan in 122.
    Oh what about 126 (the early roll film kind not the instant 35mm kind) that would be awesome! Basically LF in MF roll film, awesome! I think it's 4(and change)x6(and change).


    ~Stone

    The Important Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  2. #42
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,710
    Images
    108
    Fender is an another US company who cant compete with digital. When you buy a cheap chinese electric guitar and connect to digital processor , it turns to over saturated photoshop picture but all hipsters like it especially that death metal people.

    When Fender sees the light , they offered a computer based software processor which plays all the Fender Legendary Amp sounds one by one.

    If Kodak lives another 5 years , I would expect from them a software which simulates all their portfolio with noise, color and what the hell details. May be they can sell a license to Photoshop to put it in their software.

    I tried many of these simulators and they were faraway successful than my scans.

    Umut

  3. #43
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    6,996
    Images
    222

    Kodak's totally new film in years.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac View Post
    Fender is an another US company who cant compete with digital. When you buy a cheap chinese electric guitar and connect to digital processor , it turns to over saturated photoshop picture but all hipsters like it especially that death metal people.

    When Fender sees the light , they offered a computer based software processor which plays all the Fender Legendary Amp sounds one by one.

    If Kodak lives another 5 years , I would expect from them a software which simulates all their portfolio with noise, color and what the hell details. May be they can sell a license to Photoshop to put it in their software.

    I tried many of these simulators and they were faraway successful than my scans.

    Umut
    Pretty sure Dan Bayer and I talked about this in 2010, why they haven't come out with an in camera profile for all film to mimic its characteristics, probably has to do with company competition, but with the popularity of things like instagram, being able to switch from the Kodachrome profile to the pan F plus profile would surely benefit even traditional film guys, it would make their transition a little smoother (that is if it were even possible, it's really hard to mimic Kodachrome or Technical Pan when it comes to grain/pixel but in the near future perhaps we'll see that, I know it can be done in Photoshop to a degree, but I feel like its somehow a little more authentic coming out of the camera. Like when I shoot B&W in digital I set the camera to Monochrome, just feels like cheating if I are it B&W after I get home... Lol

    Anyway I may not own a digital camera anymore, so far the hurricane sandy disaster has left my 5D "dead in the water" literally...


    ~Stone

    The Important Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    544
    Kodak Invisi-film, which will develop in 'cantseeit-41' non-chemistry...
    testing...

  5. #45
    hoffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,819
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac View Post
    Fender is an another US company who cant compete with digital. When you buy a cheap chinese electric guitar and connect to digital processor , it turns to over saturated photoshop picture but all hipsters like it especially that death metal people.

    When Fender sees the light , they offered a computer based software processor which plays all the Fender Legendary Amp sounds one by one.

    If Kodak lives another 5 years , I would expect from them a software which simulates all their portfolio with noise, color and what the hell details. May be they can sell a license to Photoshop to put it in their software.

    I tried many of these simulators and they were faraway successful than my scans.

    Umut
    Ohhh, Ohhh, I have one of those fender modelling amp's....should I ban myself from Apug

    In relation to Kodak and digital emulation, I am not suprised it hasn't happened as a licenced product already.

  6. #46

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    I hope it's Ektar 400.
    That would be 100% awesome.

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Half Moon Bay, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by F/1.4 View Post
    That would be 100% awesome.
    I agree, that would be amazing.

  8. #48
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,547
    Images
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by hoffy View Post
    Ohhh, Ohhh, I have one of those fender modelling amp's....should I ban myself from Apug
    Yes you should. I use a Line 6 modelling amp for gigs - and I build audio equipment using valves (tubes). I should ban myself!


    Steve.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin