Perhaps substitute FP4+ for HP5+ in the 46mm rolls?
HP5+ is too fast for most classic 127 cameras.
Thank you, Bill
HP5+ is much more versatile of a film, I thought the same thing as you do, but you could probably still use it at 200 and pull the film? I've never tried 100 and pulling 2 stops but I suppose it's possible, HP5+ is magic.
And if they are going to use any other film for cameras "back in the day" that took slow film, it would be PanF+ wouldn't it?
Let's spread the word about 122 rollfilm for Kodak 3A cameras! It was on last year's list, but we didn't get enough folks for the minimum order.
What was the minimum? And how close did it come? And what was the cost per roll a year ago?
Against all reason, I've had my eye on a 3A. I must be crazy. It's the film requirement holding me back. The camera is in nice condition and could be an occasional gentle novelty user. Just want to know if I must sell my children to feed it. I must be crazy...
"When making a portrait, my approach is quite the same as when I am portraying a rock. I do not wish to impose my personality upon the sitter, but, keeping myself open to receive reactions from his own special ego, record this with nothing added: except of course when I am working professionally, when money enters in,—then for a price, I become a liar..."
— Edward Weston, Daybooks, Vol. II, February 2, 1932