status of 220 manufacture?
APUG Advertiser Freestyle Photo posted on Facebook:
"5 January at 12:53 #Kodak has officially discontinued #Portra220 #film. We have VERY limited stock."
Is this the final word for 220 everywhere?
I still live just beyond the fringe in Stittsville
I have no idea of the manufacturing status I suggest you ask the manufacturer, but B&H in the U.S are still selling 220 portra and 220 Fuji 400 H, I suggest you stock up on it if you like it I don't think it will be around for much longer.
Last edited by benjiboy; 01-08-2015 at 05:59 PM. Click to view previous post history.
Wonder what will become of the 220 finishing machine(s)?
"When making a portrait, my approach is quite the same as when I am portraying a rock. I do not wish to impose my personality upon the sitter, but, keeping myself open to receive reactions from his own special ego, record this with nothing added: except of course when I am working professionally, when money enters in,—then for a price, I become a liar..."
— Edward Weston, Daybooks, Vol. II, February 2, 1932
I suspect that this was inevitable. Kodak Alaris has been discontinuing several films that haven't been performing up to their wishes. I doubt that 220 has been rushing off the shelves, particularly since the price for Kodak 220 is almost exactly double the price of Kodak 120 in the same emulsion.
Although it is nice to be able to get 32 shots before having to change a roll, for me it is only a convenience factor. I hope Fuji keeps it around but their history as of late has not been very encouraging either.
Now I am a little worried for the continued production of 120 color roll films of any kind. The timing for Ferrania may be better than anyone anticipated. A color film producer who is capable of producing at lower volumes may end up the survivor here.
The simplest tools can be the hardest to master.
I just purchased a pro pack of Kodak Portra 160 220 (although I actually meant to order the 400 version, oh well) from B&H. I really like 220. I hope Ferrania offers its new film in 220, but I'm grateful for any medium format film.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
My Mamiya C330F can use 220 film too, and in nearly thirty years I've owned it I've never shot even one roll of it, even when I used to shoot weddings.
Originally Posted by Sirius Glass
There is a widespread market for film? I thought it was all niche?
I wish I could get B&W in 220. It would mean 16 shots on a roll instead of 8. IMO it is strictly about convenience, as has been commented. I'd like to spend less time loading film and more time exposing it.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
It seems like it was 3 times the price of 120. Color lab here charges the same for both but no savings when film is 3x price. I have 20 or 30 rolls of expired 220 that I am trying to use up. Guess I will lookfor deals on ebay.
"If its not broken, I can't afford it."
I'm impressed the 220 was only used by the wedding and girly mag photogs.
Originally Posted by benjiboy
The C330s were easy to reload but I never liked to load film in pressure situation in sun shine.
The price recently has been more than double that of 120. I did get a 220 insert for my M645 Pro (my Yashicamat 124 can, of course, use it) mainly because I got a bunch of 220 film including Agfa Optima 400 and, yay, nine rolls of Astia I still have, in a box o' film purchase. I've shot a couple of rolls of the Optima and it was fine (cold stored, supposedly - whatever, it's fine.) I think I paid $17 for the 220 insert from KEH so it was worth it just to shoot that film.
But it really doesn't have much appeal for me. 15 shots in my M645 or 12 in my Yashica are just about ideal. 30 is too many, or would be without the interchangeable backs. I can imagine times I might like 24 shots in the Yashica, especially since it's slower to load than a 645 insert (or swapping backs.) But it just isn't a big deal. Those shooting 6x7 or, more so, 6x9 cameras would have more use for it of course.
I suspect the biggest use for it was probably wedding shooters. Since so few weddings are shot on film now, and the few that are most likely are shot with cameras with quickly interchanged backs, I too am surprised it lasted this long.