Discussions: 45,221 | Messages: 609,726 | Members: 29,959 | Online: 370 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar

Sophia

by Andrew Moxom
Enter the Gallery
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1141 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
658 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
968 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Product Availability > No more Kodak papers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2005, 11:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: sao paulo - brazil
Posts: 122
Default No more Kodak papers

The majority of you must already know. I knew yesterday. Kodak stopped making paper. I don't understand why they maintain chemicals and film in production (without paper). Perhaps they stopped making them too and I don't know.
__________________
sergio caetano
sergio caetano is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-20-2005, 12:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Paul Sorensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,387
Default

Kodak announced that they were discontinuing paper and stated at that time that they were not discontinuing film and chemistry. They also didn't state that they were committed to making film and chemistry, so who knows how long that will last. Their market position in both film and chemistru seems to be stronger than paper, so hopefully they will continue to manufacture them.
__________________
Paul Sorensen
http://paulsorensenphoto.com
Paul Sorensen is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-20-2005, 08:54 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
df cardwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
Posts: 2,584
Default

For Kodak, making film is the cash source to develop digital.

Digital is not profitable for anybody, yet its considered the future. Everybody is fighting to be the last guy standing. Canon ? Kodak ? There will be only one winner.

SO film ( and chems ) will contiune. The film plant is new, efficient, and profitable.

It's likely the paper situation was not.

We all face the same problems. I KNOW I could have a big income from doing some types of photography. But the overhead would be so great, the profit would be tenuous. SO, I opt out of that market. For Kodak, why not abandon the b&w paper market, and put their eggs someplace else ? They had long ago focussed their attention of commercial products rather than 'fine art'.

Making D-76 is easy, so it's VERY profitable.
df cardwell is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-20-2005, 04:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Brac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 426
Default

It's difficult to fathom quite where Kodak are heading. In the UK & probably elsewhere they are dropping their professional digital SLR's. They have just announced the introduction of 2 "bridge" digital cameras but already the Technical Editor of "Amateur Photographer" magazine has criticised them for the very restricted ISO range (50 to 200). Unfortunately for Kodak they may be throwing everything they've got into the digital arena but they have very much slipped into the second rank of players.
Brac is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2005, 02:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brac
It's difficult to fathom quite where Kodak are heading.
Perhaps the handbasket they're riding in is a clue...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brac
In the UK & probably elsewhere they are dropping their professional digital SLR's.
'Bout time. It was the Ektra all over again--build a camera that is in many ways a world beater, but with a couple of horrible flaws, refuse to fix it, wonder briefly why it loses money, and go back to what they're good at, spewing consumer crap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brac
Unfortunately for Kodak they may be throwing everything they've got into the digital arena but they have very much slipped into the second rank of players.
They've acknowledged their incompetence in the high-end digital world. They're king of the hill in a market segment--low-end consumer digital--that Sony has admitted they believe will go extinct due to better cell cams. And they're throwing the shrinking--but profitable--traditional photography business away, one line at a time. Ten years out, Kodak's about as screwed as a diabetic hummingbird.

And they're trashing stuff that actually has a future in a digital world--things like Tech Pan that'll clobber digital as soundly ten years from now as it does today, B&W Lightjet paper they could make a killing on if they spent a little time promoting the superiority of real silver prints. Instead they keep junk like Portra 800, something with zero future in a digital world.

They don't even have the decency to sell off the facilities and formula to a niche player who could make a good business off the sales still possible in tomorrow's limited but not lost analog market. All that wonderful Rochester R&D lost forever to leave us relying on what, 50's Efke technology? Yuck.
Roger Krueger is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 08-21-2005, 05:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
djklmnop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 230
Default

Very well put, Roger!
__________________
Money is not the problem. The problem is, I don't have any.
djklmnop is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2005, 08:53 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
esanford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hertford North Carolina
Posts: 637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Sorensen
Kodak announced that they were discontinuing paper and stated at that time that they were not discontinuing film and chemistry. They also didn't state that they were committed to making film and chemistry, so who knows how long that will last. Their market position in both film and chemistru seems to be stronger than paper, so hopefully they will continue to manufacture them.
Does anyone know if Kodak just discontinued B&W paper or did they include color as well?
__________________
Often wrong, but never in doubt!
esanford is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2005, 09:34 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Lee L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by esanford
Does anyone know if Kodak just discontinued B&W paper or did they include color as well?
I haven't seen anything on this, but suspect that they still sell a lot of color paper to labs, including a lot of minilabs. I'd be surprized if color paper were discontinued.

Lee
Lee L is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2005, 09:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 630
Default

I was told that in the digital age, B&W film sales have remain strong (probably for the same reason B&W fans didn't buy Colour film and desaturate it) Even thought some B&W photographers have gone digital mainly because its convieniant.

Trouble is that Poeple will shoot B&W and then scan it. Infact acording to AP the sale of B&W developer is increasing?
ajuk is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-21-2005, 01:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Bob F.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 3,754
Default

Ah, this would be the same AP that said that both Ilford and Kodak had sold more B&W film the previous year in the UK than any time before. Six months or so later Ilford went bust quoting a 25% downturn in the previous year... IIRC, Kodak have since reported similar film sales drops (not sure if they included colour).

I was surprised because I had assumed B&W sales would not be hit anything like as much as colour (wrong again; remind me never to take up betting on the horses)...

Silverprint have quotes from the new Ilford management in their news section (http://www.silverprint.co.uk/News05.htm). They say decline is now around 15-20% and they hope it will stabilize to 5-7% (one would have hoped that they would have hoped that it would stop declining completely at some point!)

Cheers, Bob.
Bob F. is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using