Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,697   Posts: 1,482,547   Online: 881
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,740

    **Kodachrome 200 gone**

    It is official, Kodak has discontinued Kodachrome 200 as of November, 2006.

    According to my contact at Kodak, they decided to make the announcement to vendors and labs only. I saw an ebay ad for KL-200 from Dwayne's and called them today. B&H is already out ( I ordered 200 rolls in the last few days ) and it is uncertain how much is actually left at Kodak.

    Dwayne's does have a good supply that might last awhile if you need it.

    We do have at least a couple years to get this stuff souped so have a go with it. I hope I have enough time to shoot and process what is now some 1,600 rolls of all speeds.

    Sorry to break it to you, but it is the real deal..

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,079
    Images
    20
    Well, sorry to see any variety of Kodachrome go, but I never really cared for K200.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    dmr
    dmr is offline
    dmr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    493
    Hmmmm ... why is it that Kodak chose to keep this somewhat hush-hush?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    965
    Images
    101
    To keep away the angry mobs with the pitchforks and torches.

    I didn't even realize there was a Kodachrome 200. Whenever I used it in the past I just used either 25 or 64. I guess I've been out of the loop for a while.

  5. #5
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Moopheus View Post
    To keep away the angry mobs with the pitchforks and torches.

    I didn't even realize there was a Kodachrome 200. Whenever I used it in the past I just used either 25 or 64. I guess I've been out of the loop for a while.
    Not sure about the mobs - but I do think you otherwise "nailed" it.

    K-200 was never on my radar screen either. 25 became mythological - but 64 was my "bread and butter" chrome for many years.

    There's another current K-chrome thread here going around right now - guess it's a Kodachrome night!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Near Tavistock, Devon, on the edge of Dartmoor.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,018
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    Well, sorry to see any variety of Kodachrome go, but I never really cared for K200.
    That's putting it mildly. I was always puzzled why a firm that produced the excellent K25 and K64 would wish to sully the name by marketing the 200 ASA version. Specifically, I found it too grainy, less specifically I found it lacking in punch and never liked the colour rendition. Perhaps the advantages of "proper" Kodachrome still applied, though, in terms of archival qualities. Personally, I much prefer(red) the Fuji 200 films and Kodak 200 E6's.

    Still, as David says, it's sad to see any Kodachrome go, or indeed any film, and no doubt many liked it or it wouldn't have been on the shelves!

    Steve

  7. #7
    naturephoto1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Breinigsville, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,819
    Images
    84
    That is unfortunate. Though I can not remember ever shooting with Kodachrome 200. Most of my transparency film has always been between ISO of 25 and 100 and in the last 15 years between 50 and 100.

    Rich
    Richard A. Nelridge
    http://www.nelridge.com

  8. #8
    Uncle Bill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oakville and Toronto Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,360
    Images
    305
    Pity, but I have never seen Kodachrome 200 on the shelves here in Toronto. I am going to continue using Kodachrome 64 until its gone, then back to E-6.

    Bill
    "Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
    Ferris Bueller

  9. #9
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,710
    Images
    65
    Well, to give all of the information here, the final development cycle of Kodacrhome included the ISO 400 version that never was, but it also included some revisions to the other versions.

    Due to decreasing sales, all of these 'improved' versions of the current Kodachromes were cancelled. Why fix what isn't selling? That was true even in 1988.

    PE

  10. #10
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,079
    Images
    20
    One of the attractions of K200 was supposed to be for indoor sports. If you pushed it to 500 (this was a standard Kodachrome push) the color shift nicely balanced typical gymnasium lighting. I've seen some good examples of that, but have never really shot sports myself.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin