Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,206   Posts: 1,531,828   Online: 889
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: PMA film news?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,089
    Images
    2

    PMA film news?

    Did a Google search to see if there was any film news, all I could find was a new version of Kodak Gold.

    Personally I'm not too bothered I never use non pro or enthusiast aimed Colour neg films with the exception of Superia (think I am not alone there?). And I have a particular dislike of Kodal gold, after I saw it used in a review of the F6 in AP and it made the camera look awful because of the films general crappyness! In fact I had a TV show about photography, I would regually blow up mounds of Kodak Gold in the same way Top Gear is always blowing up caravans! Maybe they have made it good now!



    Link

  2. #2
    braxus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fraser Valley BC Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    425
    Personally I like Gold 100 and find it a great film other then it being grainy. I was very suprised to see Kodak updating a consumer film, especially in the 100-200 range. They claim the new films have brighter colors. I can't see how they could make Gold 100 any more saturated then it already is. And why is another question. The new PGI for Gold 100 is 42 which is down from 45. Not much of a difference, especially since 400UC and 160VC-2 (similar color saturation) both have finer grain then GA100. Though I liked the color of the current GA100, it is about time they revised them. Last revision for Gold 100 was version 6 out in around 1999- 8 years ago. But didn't Kodak say they weren't going to improve their consumer films anymore?
    Last edited by braxus; 03-13-2007 at 09:09 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #3
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,208
    Images
    20
    I've posted a review of PMA from the film perspective here--

    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum45/3...ma-2007-a.html
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,089
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by braxus View Post
    Personally I like Gold 100 and find it a great film other then it being grainy.
    Yes in the review of the F6, the guy used Gold 100 and it looked more like an 800 speed film!

  5. #5
    braxus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fraser Valley BC Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    425
    Gold 100s strong points are its true colors with good saturation and its sharpness. Grain is decent as long as prints dont get too big. Bringing it down to PGI 42 makes it similar in grain to the new current Portra 400VC film. I would suspect GA 100 is sharper. I would not go as far as to say its like an 800 film. I dont think any 800 film is less grainy then PGI 42 (or even the old PGI 45).



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin