Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 55,958   Posts: 1,148,839   Online: 1100
      
+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 70
  1. #41
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,900
    Quote Originally Posted by CarlRadford View Post
    http://filmwasters.com/forum/index.php?topic=1145.0

    Well not completely true but they are sending out positive vibes! I am sure Simon Galley will let us know what the their thoughts are at some stage!
    And what about the colour materials??

    Does that mean I had to send an e-mail to Ilford Imaging in Marly????

  2. #42
    Leon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Kent, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,049
    Quote Originally Posted by Fintan View Post
    You can be certain that anything at this stage is purely exploratory on Ilfords behalf. But if something was possible to do then Ilford Harman would be the people to do it.
    so would it then become Ilfaroid or polaford - perhaps Harmaroids - hand on, that sounds like something entirely different!

  3. #43
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,863
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon View Post
    so would it then become Ilfaroid or polaford - perhaps Harmaroids - hand on, that sounds like something entirely different!
    That's what you get when you sit in a darkroom for too long.
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  4. #44
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New York, New York
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,128
    Images
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Akki14 View Post
    That's what you get when you sit in a darkroom for too long.
    Actually, I think that's what you get when you sit at the computer too long.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  5. #45
    Fintan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ireland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,791
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon View Post
    so would it then become Ilfaroid or polaford - perhaps Harmaroids - hand on, that sounds like something entirely different!
    Harmaroid 55, beautiful, I'll take a dozen boxes sir!

    Thanks for the laugh Leon, I needed it.
    www.fpworkshops.com
    Film Photography Workshops - Ireland

  6. #46
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New York, New York
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,128
    Images
    20
    Ya know, if Ilford could make a P/N instant film with something like FP4+ as the neg and the Type 55 Positive as the print, they might even come out about the same speed, which would be a major improvement over Type 55.

    If the neg were slightly faster than the print, there should be enough latitude in the neg that you could expose for the print and have a good neg. With Type 55, the neg was about a stop slower than the print, so unless the light was flat enough that you could split the difference, you had to choose whether to expose for the neg or for the print.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  7. #47
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,287
    Images
    140
    The best scenario would be an Ilford/Fuji joint project to continue Polaroid films. Fuji manufacturing the colour emulsions, Ilford manufacturing the B&W and then Ilford confectioning/packaging both the colour & B&W products, then Fuji distribute them. Polaroid would almost give away machinery as it would be scrapped anyway just to keep the good-will of past users.

    Ian

  8. #48
    Alex Bishop-Thorpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,417
    Images
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    The best scenario would be an Ilford/Fuji joint project to continue Polaroid films. Fuji manufacturing the colour emulsions, Ilford manufacturing the B&W and then Ilford confectioning/packaging both the colour & B&W products, then Fuji distribute them. Polaroid would almost give away machinery as it would be scrapped anyway just to keep the good-will of past users.

    Ian
    This is what I was thinking, play on each of their strengths - I'm impressed to even see a response from Harman, actually. I wasn't expecting Delta 25 to ever be seriously considered either though (even if it was dismissed), so I guess the analogue world is still full of surprises. Maybe things just got a bit less depressing.
    Heavy-Arts, my blog.
    The Prospect Project, my big project.

    Worry less. Photograph more.

  9. #49
    Martin Reed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    North London
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    323

    IR Viewing

    Quote Originally Posted by tim_walls View Post
    Presumably, the problems of IR are also problems for Ilford with SFX. And as for working in darkness... Do you think they make HP5+ with the lights on? :-D. All panchromatic films require manufacturing in total darkness.
    .....
    This a bit of an aside in this thread, but IR viewing devices, including goggles are standard practice in any photographic manufacturing plant, and when wearing a set it's almost the same as working in daylight. (But of course they cannot be used with IR sensitive films).

    For a demonstration of their use see the end section of the film 'The Silence of the Lambs'. We've got a set we use in the lab at Silverprint - the downside is it gets one very lazy at spiral loading technique

  10. #50
    tim_walls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Croydon & Leeds
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,036
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin Reed View Post
    This a bit of an aside in this thread, but IR viewing devices, including goggles are standard practice in any photographic manufacturing plant, and when wearing a set it's almost the same as working in daylight. (But of course they cannot be used with IR sensitive films).

    For a demonstration of their use see the end section of the film 'The Silence of the Lambs'. We've got a set we use in the lab at Silverprint - the downside is it gets one very lazy at spiral loading technique
    Don't worry, I was only teasing him at the idea that 'normal' film didn't need to be made in darkness . I thought they had IR cameras in fact on the coating line at Mobberley, although that could be my imagination...



    I ahve to say, I'd be amazed if Ilford took up production of any Polaroid materials, and more than a little worried about what it would do to the future of the company... Don't get me wrong, on the one hand I'd be delighted to have Polaroid materials stick around (and preferably at a more reasonable price - 20 sheets of Type 79 cost >US$160 over here at the moment :o), but I'd rather Ilford didn't go down the tubes because of the costs of doing it...

    The happiest most realistic outcome for me I can think of at the moment would just be if Fuji could start making their existing emulsions in single-sheet format, and over the slightly longer term maybe introduce two new types - a neg/pos type-55-a-like and a colour emulsion more suited to lifts along the lines of type 69.
    Another day goes under; a little bourbon will take the strain...



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin