Discussions: 45,221 | Messages: 609,735 | Members: 29,959 | Online: 370 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar

Paige

by Andrew Moxom
Enter the Gallery
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1141 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
658 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
968 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Product Availability > Could Ilford make Polaroid?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2008, 03:26 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Falkenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 448
Blog Entries: 11
Default Could Ilford make Polaroid?

How do we get Ilford to take over on making Polaroid products. They seem very committed to analogue products. Polaroid are looking for a company to take over from what I read in a press release.

Any input on this idea ?
Falkenberg is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 03:51 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Andy K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sunny Southend, England.
Posts: 7,077
Default

I think the title of this thread needs a question mark, as a statement it could be misleading!

I doubt Ilford would take on making Polaroid. If they were to take on a discontinued product I would much prefer to see them making an HIE equivalent.
__________________


-----------My Flickr-----------
The Earth has music for those who listen
Andy K is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
kraker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Netherlands (south)
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy K View Post
I think the title of this thread needs a question mark, as a statement it could be misleading!
Agreed, a question mark at the very least.

And... as much as I would love to see continued availability of Polaroid products, I'm not too keen on Ilford taking this up. Yes, they are commited; yes, it may seem a logical choice, but let's be honest, in the end, it's the money that counts. There's a reason for Polaroid ceasing production. 24000 APUGers, even if they would *all* shoot polaroid, is not enough to keep a full range of Polaroid products. At least, that's my guess. I wouldn't want to see Ilford going down again... One time is more than enough!

I'm just guessing here, there are people who have a much better grasp on sales, costs of production and all other numbers involved (I don't know how helpful the Polaroid company would be in providing their recenet figures?)... So, if HARMAN or any other company would want to look into this, I'm sure they can come up with a more funded conclusion...

And of course, I would be happy if that conclusion would be "we'll DO it!"
__________________
photolog.kraker.de
-- Arafwch nawr --
kraker is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Akki14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,454
Default

I think Fujifilm would be more likely to take it up because they already produce B&W and colour instant film (in pull-apart pack films and in integratal varieties). I'd hate to see Ilford go under purely because they tried to take on something they're just not set up to produce.
__________________
~Heather
oooh shiny!
Akki14 is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Aurelien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Limoges, France
Posts: 358
Default

Everybody knows that the biggest issue with HIE making is quality control. On the major part of films, quality control is made with Infra red reading of the film surface. It's impossible with HIE. So kodak had a special plant for this film, with employees working in total darkness. This type of plant is not economically possible, now.
With polaroid clearance of all films, it's a part of photography that is going away. Lots of great photographers are still going using instant films and the loss of their working material is really a pity. So, whoever it is, if a company could make new instant films (I think Fuji could) it would be a great new.
__________________
Aurelien, Analog Photographer
http://www.aurelien.jepose.com
Aurelien is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 02-14-2008, 04:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
tim_walls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Croydon & Leeds
Posts: 666
Default

Presumably, the problems of IR are also problems for Ilford with SFX. And as for working in darkness... Do you think they make HP5+ with the lights on? :-D. All panchromatic films require manufacturing in total darkness.

(Not suggesting IR sensitive films don't have their own special manufacturing problems - I was just rather tickled by the idea that normal film wasn't made in the dark. I seem to recall the lightswitch on the coating line at Ilford had three positions - total darkness for films, safelight for paper, and 'regular' for maintenance. I may be misremembering though.)
__________________
Another day goes under; a little bourbon will take the strain...
tim_walls is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:40 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,699
Default

Ilford do not have a particularly significant footprint in the world photography market place, their products aren't mainstream and are only sold by more specialist photo stores.

On the other hand most towns and cities have many shops and stores selling Kodak and Fuji products, and so Fuji would be the only logical company to market Polaroid compatible alternatives, plus they already have all the technology.

It has to be realised that the market outside the North America and Europe is very different, where I live there must be a eight or nine "photo" shops, none sell any B&W materials or 120 film, but they all sell Kodak or Fuji consumer colour films.

So to think Ilford would want to even contemplate taking over manufacture of Polaroid materials is rather far fetched.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Aurelien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Limoges, France
Posts: 358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tim_walls View Post
Presumably, the problems of IR are also problems for Ilford with SFX. And as for working in darkness... Do you think they make HP5+ with the lights on? :-D. All panchromatic films require manufacturing in total darkness.

(Not suggesting IR sensitive films don't have their own special manufacturing problems - I was just rather tickled by the idea that normal film wasn't made in the dark. I seem to recall the lightswitch on the coating line at Ilford had three positions - total darkness for films, safelight for paper, and 'regular' for maintenance. I may be misremembering though.)
Of course, all films are made in total darkness. But with panchromatic films, or near IR films, quality control is made autimatically, with an IR reader (I don't know the wavelength, but it is compatible with SFX, of course). So employees have not to work and to manipulate films in total darkness. Machines do it.
__________________
Aurelien, Analog Photographer
http://www.aurelien.jepose.com
Aurelien is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Falkenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 448
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Sorry about the missing questionamark. I am sure that it is not worth the trouble for any company to continue Polaroids entire line of products, but I am sure that there must be a market for the 4x5" and larger products used for all the fancy artwork. That would limit the number of producst and make it easier for any company to continue this production. Who knows, Polaroid may even end up doing some limited productions from time to time for this market. I just hope that we can continue to get these product for many years.
Falkenberg is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-14-2008, 04:49 AM   #10 (permalink)
Ole
 
Ole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 8,651
Blog Entries: 1
Default

I've changed the title to something closer to what was intended.
__________________
-- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
Norway
Ole is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using