Mirko, I think you summed up everything very well, thank you.
Interestingly many X-rays are now made digitally, but then output to a thermal silver film because that's what the doctors need.
Ian
Or the hospitals don't have a proper PACS system and the digital images only stay in the system a few months. Film is used for archiving.
Very few hospitals use film in their X-Ray machines these days - it's either digital capture or a reusable plate which is then scanned with a laser of a specific colour...
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG
have the option to remove this ad.)
I read in the newspaper yesterday that Agfa Gevaert Belgium will fire another 160 employees because of the ongoing sales problems. And more might follow. It's mainly desk jobs they will get rid off.
__________________
Sure, I could give you a boring explanation who I really am but I rather let the Origami do the talking.
My only wish would be to keep APX 100 in production, and the resurection of APX 25, for films. I think APX 400 is less important since there are equivalent on the market: foma 400, hp5, triX, bergger 400.
Actually, there is a market for slow films like rollei 25, so the return of APX 25 would be a real benefit for photography. But there is one condition: Adox brand will have to be better distributed. If no, there is no relevance to produce such products if we can only buy them on one website!
[quote=AgX;594701]In those papers I don’t read anything on film, but rather about shareholders accusing Agfa-managers of mismanagement.
QUOTE]
Agfa-Gevaert's problems are in their Graphics and Medical divisions. Their "Materials/Special Products"-division, where film is made, is relatively doing well.