Discussions: 45,221 | Messages: 609,725 | Members: 29,959 | Online: 376 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1141 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
658 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
968 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Product Availability > Fujifilm closing two plants in the US

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2008, 04:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
keithwms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,738
Blog Entries: 3
Default Fujifilm closing two plants in the US

Sorry to relate some bad news...

http://iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/2...lm-Layoffs.php

Quote:
Originally Posted by AP News Wire, February 29, 2008
WILLIAMSPORT, Maryland: Fujifilm Holdings Corporation says the shift to digital photography is prompting it to close film processing plants in Maryland and Indiana that employ a total of 230 people.

The Fujicolor Processing plant in Williamsport will close March 12, idling 125 workers.

The plant in Crawfordsville, Indiana, with 105 workers, will close March 19.

Fujicolor customer service director Darla Camman said the plants process film for Wal-Mart, Sam's Club and other U.S. retail stores. She said the work will be moved to other Fujicolor labs.

Camman said the plant closings will better position the company for the rapidly increasing shift from film to digital photography.

Fujifilm is based in Tokyo. Its U.S. headquarters in Valhalla, New York.

My understanding is that these are processing and not production facilities.
__________________
Keith Williams

My APUG Portfolio
Photography: keithwilliamsphoto.net
Physics: Nanodevice physics

"I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." - Thomas Jefferson
keithwms is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2008, 04:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
david b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: new mexico
Posts: 3,466
Default

These are processing plants. Not manufacturing plants.

As the article says, it processes the film for Walmart and others.

This has nothing to do with medium or large format film.
__________________
.my blog.
david b is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2008, 04:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
tim_walls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Croydon & Leeds
Posts: 666
Default

"Idling"? Is that the greatest euphemism ever, or does it actually have some sort of specific meaning that "laying off" or "making redundant" doesn't?
__________________
Another day goes under; a little bourbon will take the strain...
tim_walls is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2008, 05:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
AgX
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,647
Default

Over here once the term (in translation) `celebrating shifts´ was used.
AgX is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2008, 05:34 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 12,568
Default

I guess they'll just be sitting there waiting for the red light to change to green.
__________________
Photography-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb/photo
Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 03-01-2008, 05:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
copake_ham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC or Copake or Tucson
Posts: 4,083
Default

It's a bit of a bummer because I was hoping against hope that the "decline" in local processing was due to the "Wal-Mart effect" and that perhaps overall processing demand wasn't too far down.

I'm not sure how much this affects me personally. I still find plenty of "drug store outlets" for processing C-41. In fact, CVS is making a big expansion in NYC right now and their new store at 42nd and 3rd has a spanking new Frontier machine.
copake_ham is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-04-2008, 01:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Posts: 1,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copake_ham View Post
It's a bit of a bummer because I was hoping against hope that the "decline" in local processing was due to the "Wal-Mart effect" and that perhaps overall processing demand wasn't too far down.

I'm not sure how much this affects me personally. I still find plenty of "drug store outlets" for processing C-41. In fact, CVS is making a big expansion in NYC right now and their new store at 42nd and 3rd has a spanking new Frontier machine.

I think the proliferation of one-hour mini-labs, mostly using Fuji made equipment is probably key in the decision to close a couple of the central processing locations. Consider, what "benefit" do you have by sending your film off to a central location over a well run mini-lab?
PHOTOTONE is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-04-2008, 02:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
keithwms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,738
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Is that what these plants were doing? My guess is that they were doing E6 and b&w. I thought pretty much all c41 was done locally now.
__________________
Keith Williams

My APUG Portfolio
Photography: keithwilliamsphoto.net
Physics: Nanodevice physics

"I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." - Thomas Jefferson
keithwms is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-05-2008, 03:04 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
kraker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Netherlands (south)
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHOTOTONE View Post
I think the proliferation of one-hour mini-labs, mostly using Fuji made equipment is probably key in the decision to close a couple of the central processing locations. Consider, what "benefit" do you have by sending your film off to a central location over a well run mini-lab?
Most one-hour minilabs only process C-41 in 35mm. Whenever I drop off a 110, 120, 220 C-41 or E-6 film, or a 35 mm E-6, it will be sent off to a central processing location.

I guess that's also a reason for the closure; they won't get that many 110/120/220/E-6, so they can centralise it even further.

(Makes me wonder how many of those central processing locations there are in the US. I don't even know how many there are in my small country... I know of one central Fuji lab; perhaps there are some other brands out there as well...)
__________________
photolog.kraker.de
-- Arafwch nawr --
kraker is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-06-2008, 06:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seaford, DE 19973
Posts: 15
Default

My local Wal-Mart charges the same price for 1 hr service as they do for the longer outside lab. The only difference is one set of prints as opposed to two sets. In my case I only want one set any way so I can choose the pics I wish to have either more of or larger versions of. With such a small difference in price 2 to 3 day service does not seem to make since.
jmcclure is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using