Discussions: 39,933 | Messages: 538,099 | Members: 26,363 | Online: 373 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
Forum Search:   Advanced   RSS MOBILE
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Product Availability > Statement Regarding ILFORD Photo / POLAROID

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
04-28-2008, 09:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 693
Default Statement Regarding ILFORD Photo / POLAROID

Dear All,

I have been out for a few days and several of you have sent me PM's re POLAROID : Please see below :

April 18th, 2008, Mobberley, Cheshire UK and Minnetonka, MN, USA -- HARMAN technology Limited and its monochrome brand, ILFORD Photo and Polaroid Worldwide have been in discussions about ILFORD Photo taking on production of Polaroid's black and white professional instant sheet film. Despite their best efforts, together the prospective partners have determined that they can not find a commercially viable way forward.

HARMAN's Chairman and Managing Director, Phil Harris said. " The processes involved in the manufacture and assembly of professional instant sheet film products are very demanding and it would require substantial investment to re-establish them at HARMAN technology's site in Cheshire, England. When compared with current and projected sales for the products, it was clear that such an investment could not be justified."

Phil Harris continues: " While we had hoped to work together on continuing the production of instant sheet film, it is cost prohibitive to meet the declining demand. As a company, we are saddened that such an inspirational form of expression will disappear, but we will always remain staunchly committed to the long term future of monochrome photography in all its facets and we will continue to do everything we can to support it".


Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
Simon R Galley is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 09:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 11,286
Default

Thanks for taking a serious look at it at least and keeping us up to date.
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 09:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Sino's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chania, Greece
Posts: 150
Default

Sad news, although well expected and justified, Simon. All the best.

-Sino.
Sino is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 09:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: new mexico
Posts: 3,038
Default

yeah....thanks for seeing what could be done. It's a real shame.
david b is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 09:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,024
Default

It was a great effort Simon and truly appreciated. I used a lot of Polaroid products over the years. They will be missed, and it would have been great to see Ilford involved. Maybe Kodak would take it up. Hah, not in a million years after the lawsuit.

Ron
Photo Engineer is online now   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

04-28-2008, 09:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
arigram's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Crete, Greece
Posts: 3,519
Default

arigram is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 10:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
SuzanneR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,408
Default

Bummer, of course, and not entirely surprising, but I think we all appreciate the effort Ilford made in looking into it.
SuzanneR is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 10:32 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Alex Hawley's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 2,497
Default

Thanks for your efforts Simon. At least the possibility was duly explored and I know that alone cost some money to do.
Alex Hawley is online now   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 10:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valley Stream, NY
Posts: 934
Default

I didn't expect it to happen either, but at least you guys explored the possibility.

Fuji? You guys already make instant film. Take on Type 55?
fschifano is online now   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
04-28-2008, 10:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Suffolk, England
Posts: 164
Default

Thanks for trying...
keeds is offline   Send them a private message Reply With Quote Top Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 

  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2007 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using