|
|
|
-
 Originally Posted by ajuk
It's a shame to see 160s go, but I always use Portra 160nc, that stuff is just excellent.
160s is only going in 35mm and as you write Kodak Portra 160NC is a very fine portrait film, but unfortunately Kodak don't make anything like Fuji Reala that's sharp , produces saturated colour, and accurate skin tones at the same time, and don't tell me Ektar because although its a wonderful film, is sharp , saturated and fine grained, even Kodak don't recommend it for portraits.
-
 Originally Posted by benjiboy
160s is only going in 35mm and as you write Kodak Portra 160NC is a very fine portrait film, but unfortunately Kodak don't make anything like Fuji Reala that's sharp , produces saturated colour, and accurate skin tones at the same time, and don't tell me Ektar because although its a wonderful film, is sharp , saturated and fine grained, even Kodak don't recommend it for portraits.
What about 160VC? I find it sharp, saturated, and great skin tones. But I guess it's lacking in one of those departments for you.
While I do find Ektar gives pretty good skin tones, I tend not to use it for people pictures for other reasons.
-
 Originally Posted by benjiboy
It would seem to me that for 35mm users who are lovers of Reala and Pro 160 S it would be a good time to get some M/F gear.
I did seriously consider this. What's making me hesitant is the future of RA4 paper - without it I won't shoot colour.
As for Reala replacements: I thought I'd try 160VC, Superia 200 and maybe Gold 200.
-
 Originally Posted by Tim Gray
What about 160VC? I find it sharp, saturated, and great skin tones. But I guess it's lacking in one of those departments for you.
While I do find Ektar gives pretty good skin tones, I tend not to use it for people pictures for other reasons.
I like Kodak 160 VC Tim but I find that even though it is more saturated than 160NC and has more contrast it still has the same pastel colour pallet, I find Reala unique in that it gives punchy colour and gentle skin tones at the same time.
-
 Originally Posted by benjiboy
I like Kodak 160 VC Tim but I find that even though it is more saturated than 160NC and has more contrast it still has the same pastel colour pallet, I find Reala unique in that it gives punchy colour and gentle skin tones at the same time.
Ahh makes sense.
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
I don't shoot a lot of color. But, I just found out about Fuji 160C at my lab today. It was a bit shocking. I just started using the film, and I'll be getting my first rolls back from the lab on Wednesday.
Why, Photography Gods?! WHY?!
-
 Originally Posted by Brandon D.
Why, Photography Gods?! WHY?! 
Because you mere mortals stopped paying us tribute!!! You want film, then SHOW US THE MONEY!!!
2F/2F
"Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."
- Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)
-
Do we have a final word on 800Z? There seems to be variable stock in different places.
-
800Z for:
Germany and BeNeLux:
Discontinued in all formats.
-
Robert, do you know the news on Reala for Germany & the Benelux?
|
|