Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,900   Posts: 1,584,411   Online: 750
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35
  1. #21

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wismar, Germany
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    161
    I just got my first samples of both RPX100 and RPX400 (10 each) and will test them the next few weeks with Rodinal and Caffenol-C-M as developers.
    I really hope, they're a replacement for APX... otherwise, I have to buy as much of the old APX as I can get and get a new freezer

    The 120 will be available in late december if everything goes as planned.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Seaford,UK South Coast
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4
    Let's stick to the doom and gloom, I've just tried Four Rollei Retro 400, developed in Rollei RHS, precise timing and temperature and drew out four almost clear strips, Then processed an Ilford Delta 100 in the RHS and all came out good. Two of the Rollei films using a different camera, still almost clear, very faint image. So, went back to my favorite film Ilford HP5, still in RHS developer, and all good negatives.Could be me!! As my previous communication says, I'm returning to my darkroom, but have processed many films before, never almost clear negs.
    I have one more Rollei film to go, not sure what else to try, during the last film I increased the time by two minutes but no real improvement.
    I do accept that this is part of the fun of this hobby, all digital are perfect but thats why I'm back in the darkroom.
    Any information on this film would be very wellcome or I may have to pull out "The Beginners Guide to Photography"

  3. #23

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2
    You've got to calibrate your films....I've found recommended development times to be way off what I determine to be correct following controlled testing using a densitometer. If you believe published times you will, in some cases, experience the results which you apparently have.

  4. #24
    rphenning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    341
    Never had to calibrate tri-x and I can get 2 or 3 rolls of that for what I would get for one roll of Rollei film. Nah.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wismar, Germany
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    161
    The Rollei Retros are basically relabeled APX and they use the same developement.
    The RPXs seem to need a slightly longer time, but I haven't tested enough to give exact numbers. They're not bad films, but nothing special either. I found the 100 (developed 13min in R09 1+40) to have really nice tones, mediocre grain and pretty low sharpness. The 400 is similar, but does hardly reach 400 ASA while having a little more contrast.
    The RPX 100 was really nice in Caffenol-C-M, though... Rodinal/R09 is probably not the best choice for these two.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    83
    Retro 100/400 is APX
    RPX is Ilford/Kentmere.
    But to Caffenol "experts" this should be all the same anyway, so who cares...

  7. #27
    dr5chrome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    448
    Images
    12
    The news we have is these 2 films are NOT happening.

    regards.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kiel, Germany
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    68
    Did you say they started announcing and selling these films in their blatant style - and now it's already gone?

    In that case it was the shortest lifetime of a family of films I ever heard of.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    895
    Should this really by that hard to verify?

    Aren't these just the Ilford-prodcued Kentmere 100 and 400 films, anyhow?
    Digital Photography is just "why-tech" not "high tech"..

  10. #30
    Alex Bishop-Thorpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,455
    Images
    29
    Ilford's statement was that they don't participate in rebranding their products any more, after the 2005 restructuring - this is something they reaffirmed when Kentmere 100/400 came out. But there's no reason they cant contract out their production line for other manufacturers, or even formulate new emulsions for them. They've done this in the past. It makes sense, they have a top of the line facility that's sitting idle between their own production runs. Just because its made on Ilford's machinery doesn't mean they're an emulsion that's already on the market.

    That said, I have no idea what it is or where it comes from, so who knows.
    The Analogue Laboratory, or 'so you built a darkroom in an old factory in the industrial zone'.
    Blog thing!.

    Worry less. Photograph more.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin