Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,304   Posts: 1,681,571   Online: 885
      
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567
Results 61 to 62 of 62
  1. #61
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    24,672
    Images
    65
    Aldevo;

    Kodak did not really downsize and their production facilities are truly "hideously large" in the face of the current market. What they did do was slow down production as much as possible in the face of this huge production facility.

    PE

  2. #62

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,066
    Images
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by aldevo View Post
    I would base that statement on a) Their attempts to compete in the consumer inkjet printer market which has forced competitors to lower prices, thereby lowering their own earnings
    That seems pretty unlikely--consumer grade inkjets can hardly get much cheaper, and it's already a highly competitive market. I don't see Kodak being a huge threat to Brother, LexMark, HP, Epson, etc.
    "People get bumped off." -- Weegee

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin