Alt Print Exchange Round 2 May 2006 - Page 2

photomc · 12-08-2005, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donbga

.... Part of the purpose of this exchange was to expose the neophytes to output from good alt printers.

May will be fine with me. I think I'll be doing gum over palladium or kallitype for the next round.

Don Bryant

Agree with Don, thought we were very fortunate to have so many excellent printers participate (in other words I was blown away). Just a thought, set up x number of groups by the expert printers that elect round 2, then put the rest of our names in a hat and draw the groups. Who would determine who is an expert? My guess is that Don, Gerhard, Joe, Mateo, and others could help with that.

jimgalli · 12-08-2005, 09:25 AM

Count me in. Hurry, before the folks see what I sent in R1!

mark · 12-08-2005, 09:31 AM

I'm in. Finally got a neg for round one and will be printing soon.

Aggie · 12-08-2005, 09:51 AM

Count me in, I'm having as much fun as the postcard exchange. Some here know how addicted I became to that.

matt miller · 12-08-2005, 10:17 AM

I'm in for round 2.

Jeremy · 12-08-2005, 11:08 AM

My prints are done for round 1, but a freak snow/ice/sleet/hail storm here in D/FW kept me from heading to the post office yesterday. Will mail out today! So definitely keep me in for round 2.

CarlRadford · 12-08-2005, 11:30 AM

To date:

Carl Radford
John Brewer
Art
Ole
Joe Lipka
Mike C
David A. Goldfarb
Christian Nze
Don Bryant
Randy
Jim Gali
Aggie
Jeremy Moore
Mark
Matt Miller
Gerhard
Steve Allen
Menacing Tourist
Diane

CarlRadford · 12-08-2005, 11:34 AM

Agreed it is a good idea to spread the "experts" and hopefully someone will take on that role when it comes time to make up groups. Please don't shy away from the task - as I am sure some will say that it is hard to judge who the experts are without seeing the work - but I am sure someone will stand up and be counted? The other suggestion I have is to try and ensure that, as far as possible, we try and ensure that no-one in round two is in the same group as anyone they were in round one with?

Ole - thanks for making me sticky - I think......

Carl

gbock · 12-08-2005, 11:39 AM

I'm in as well. It was great to see the work produced by other APUGers. This may be the nudge I need to try another process...

Gerhard

Jeremy · 12-08-2005, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlRadford

The other suggestion I have is to try and ensure that, as far as possible, we try and ensure that no-one in round two is in the same group as anyone they were in round one with?l

Carl,
that will work right now, but from experience with the generic group print exchange, once you hit rounds 3 & 4 it is just not possible anymore.